» Articles » PMID: 31448250

Interhospital Transport on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation of Neonates-Perspective for the Future

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2019 Aug 27
PMID 31448250
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cases in neonates has been relatively constant. Future expansion lays in new indications for treatment. Regionalization to high-volume ECMO centers allows for optimal utilization of resources, reduction in costs, morbidity, and mortality. Mobile ECMO services available "24-7" are needed to provide effective logistics and reliable infrastructure for patient safety. ECMO transports are usually high-risk and complex. To reduce complications during ECMO transport communication using time-out, checklists, and ECMO A-B-C are paramount in any size mobile program. Team members' education, clinical training, and experience are important. For continuing education, regular wet-lab training, and simulation practices in teams increase performance and confidence. In the future the artificial placenta for the extremely premature infant (23-28 gestational weeks) will be introduced. This will enforce the development and adaptation of ECMO devices and materials for increased biocompatibility to manage the high-risk prem-ECMO (28-34 weeks) patients. These methods will likely first be introduced at a few high-volume neonatal ECMO centers. The ECMO team brings bedside competence for assessment, cannulation, and commencement of therapy, followed by a safe transport to an experienced ECMO center. How transport algorithms for the artificial placentae will affect mobile ECMO is unclear. ECMO transport services in the newborn should firstly be an out-reach service led and provided by ELSO member centers that continuously report transport data to an expansion of the ELSO Registry to include transport quality follow-up and research. For future development and improvement follow-up and sharing of data are important.

References
1.
Foley D, Pranikoff T, Younger J, Swaniker F, Hemmila M, Remenapp R . A review of 100 patients transported on extracorporeal life support. ASAIO J. 2002; 48(6):612-9. DOI: 10.1097/00002480-200211000-00007. View

2.
Ford J . Neonatal ECMO: Current controversies and trends. Neonatal Netw. 2006; 25(4):229-38. DOI: 10.1891/0730-0832.25.4.229. View

3.
Laberge J, Flageole H . Fetal tracheal occlusion for the treatment of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. World J Surg. 2007; 31(8):1577-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9074-7. View

4.
Cornish J, Carter J, Gerstmann D, Null Jr D . Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a means of stabilizing and transporting high risk neonates. ASAIO Trans. 1991; 37(4):564-8. View

5.
Prodhan P, Fiser R, Cenac S, Bhutta A, Fontenot E, Moss M . Intrahospital transport of children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: indications, process, interventions, and effectiveness. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009; 11(2):227-33. PMC: 3039026. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b063b2. View