» Articles » PMID: 31444672

The Impact of Size and Position of a Mechanical Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Novel Insights Through Computational Modelling and Simulation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Aug 25
PMID 31444672
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become an established procedure to treat severe aortic stenosis. Correct device sizing/positioning is crucial for optimal outcome. Lotus valve sizing is based upon multiple aortic root dimensions. Hence, it often occurs that two valve sizes can be selected. In this study, patient-specific computer simulation is adopted to evaluate the influence of Lotus size/position on paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) and conduction abnormalities, in patients with equivocal aortic root dimensions. First, simulation was performed in 62 patients to validate the model in terms of predicted AR and conduction abnormalities using postoperative echocardiographic, angiographic and ECG-based data. Then, two Lotus sizes were simulated at two positions in patients with equivocal aortic root dimensions. Large valve size and deep position were associated with higher contact pressure, while only large size, not position, significantly reduced the predicted AR. Despite general trends, simulations revealed that optimal device size/position is patient-specific.

Citing Articles

Towards patient-specific prediction of conduction abnormalities induced by transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a combined mechanistic modelling and machine learning approach.

Galli V, Loncaric F, Rocatello G, Astudillo P, Sanchis L, Regueiro A Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023; 2(4):606-615.

PMID: 36713106 PMC: 9708019. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab063.


Long-term prognostic impact of paravalvular leakage on coronary artery disease requires patient-specific quantification of hemodynamics.

Khodaei S, Garber L, Bauer J, Emadi A, Keshavarz-Motamed Z Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):21357.

PMID: 36494362 PMC: 9734172. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21104-8.


Leaflet Stresses During Full Device Simulation of Crimping to 6 mm in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, TAVI.

Bressloff N Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2022; 13(5):735-750.

PMID: 35230649 PMC: 9616759. DOI: 10.1007/s13239-022-00614-6.


Proof of Concept: Measuring Aortic Annulus Resistance by Means of Pressure-Volume Curves During Balloon Inflation to Guide Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Noterdaeme T, Gesenhues J, Vogt F, Massberg S, Marx N Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:665029.

PMID: 33996948 PMC: 8119645. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.665029.


Cardiovascular patient-specific modeling: Where are we now and what does the future look like?.

Redaelli A, Votta E APL Bioeng. 2020; 4(4):040401.

PMID: 33195957 PMC: 7655138. DOI: 10.1063/5.0031452.


References
1.
de Jaegere P, De Santis G, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, Bruining N, Dezutter T . Patient-Specific Computer Modeling to Predict Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(5):508-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.003. View

2.
Mao W, Wang Q, Kodali S, Sun W . Numerical Parametric Study of Paravalvular Leak Following a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Deployment Into a Patient-Specific Aortic Root. J Biomech Eng. 2018; 140(10). PMC: 6056191. DOI: 10.1115/1.4040457. View

3.
Leon M, Smith C, Mack M, Makkar R, Svensson L, Kodali S . Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(17):1609-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. View

4.
Siontis G, Praz F, Pilgrim T, Mavridis D, Verma S, Salanti G . Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(47):3503-3512. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225. View

5.
Fujita B, Kutting M, Seiffert M, Scholtz S, Egron S, Prashovikj E . Calcium distribution patterns of the aortic valve as a risk factor for the need of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 17(12):1385-1393. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev343. View