» Articles » PMID: 31440605

The Recent Trend in Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 24
PMID 31440605
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Development of evidence-based medicine has made a big change in diagnosis and treatment of chronic low back pain. The recent trend is assessed through a review of literature.

Methods: The articles published in these 10 years are reviewed, and important points are examined.

Results: In diagnosis, challenges for history taking and limit of imaging or clinical guidelines are revealed. In treatment, cognitive behavioral treatment and exercises are proved effective. Sleep disturbance has recently attracted attention as a factor associated with low back pain. Cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment modalities has come to be emphasized.

Conclusions: Diagnosis and treatment of chronic low back pain have been significantly changing. Multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach is essential. Chronic low back pain should be treated as a total pain, not a local pain.

Citing Articles

Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally.

Chang D, Lui A, Matsoyan A, Safaee M, Aryan H, Ames C Neurospine. 2024; 21(2):487-501.

PMID: 38955526 PMC: 11224735. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448372.186.


Online health information-seeking behaviours for low back pain in the United Kingdom: analysis of data from Google trends and the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2004-2019.

Patel H, Shepherd T Int Health. 2024; 17(1):71-76.

PMID: 38391366 PMC: 11697167. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae020.


Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain.

Price M, Cupler Z, Hawk C, Bednarz E, Walters S, Daniels C Chiropr Man Therap. 2022; 30(1):26.

PMID: 35562756 PMC: 9101938. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00435-3.


Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Nationwide, Multicenter Study in Japan.

Inoue G, Kaito T, Matsuyama Y, Yamashita T, Kawakami M, Takahashi K Spine Surg Relat Res. 2021; 5(4):252-263.

PMID: 34435149 PMC: 8356229. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0083.


Characteristics of relief and residual low back pain after discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation: analysis using a detailed visual analog scale.

Takahashi H, Aoki Y, Inoue M, Saito J, Nakajima A, Sonobe M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):167.

PMID: 33573617 PMC: 7879619. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04015-z.


References
1.
Williams C, Maher C, Latimer J, McLachlan A, Hancock M, Day R . Efficacy of paracetamol for acute low-back pain: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014; 384(9954):1586-96. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60805-9. View

2.
Pearson A, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Zhao W, Abdu W, Weinstein J . Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(21):1791-802. PMC: 3758127. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182634b04. View

3.
Hughes D, Bhargavan M, Sunshine J . Imaging self-referral associated with higher costs and limited impact on duration of illness. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(12):2244-51. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0413. View

4.
Henschke N, Maher C, Refshauge K . A systematic review identifies five "red flags" to screen for vertebral fracture in patients with low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(2):110-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.013. View

5.
. The "top 5" lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(15):1385-90. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.231. View