» Articles » PMID: 31428884

Denitrification Characterization of Dissolved Oxygen Microprofiles in Lake Surface Sediment Through Analyzing Abundance, Expression, Community Composition and Enzymatic Activities of Denitrifier Functional Genes

Overview
Journal AMB Express
Date 2019 Aug 21
PMID 31428884
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The responses of denitrifiers and denitrification ability to dissolved oxygen (DO) concent in different layers of surface lake sediments are still poorly understood. Here, the optimal denitrification condition was constructed based on response surface methodology (RSM) to analyze the denitrification characteristics of surface sediments. The aerobic zone (AEZ), hypoxic zone (HYZ), up-anoxic zone (ANZ-1) and sub-anoxic zone (ANZ-2) were partitioned based on the oxygen contents, and sediments were collected using a customized-designed sub-millimeter scale sampling device. Integrated real-time quantitative PCR, Illumina Miseq-based sequencing and denitrifying enzyme activities analysis revealed that denitrification characteristics varied among different DO layers. Among the four layers, the DNA abundance and RNA expression levels of norB, nirS and nosZ were the highest at the aerobic layer, hypoxic layer and up-axoic layer, respectively. The hypoxia and up-anaerobic layer were the active nitrogen removal layers, since these two layers displayed the highest DNA abundance, RNA expression level and enzyme activities of denitrification functional genes. The abundance of major denitrifying bacteria showed significant differences among layers, with Azoarcus, Pseudogulbenkiania and Rhizobium identified as the main nirS, nirK and nosZ-based denitrifiers. Pearson's correlation revealed that the response of denitrifiers to environmental factors differed greatly among DO layers. Furthermore, napA showed higher DNA abundance and RNA expression level in the aerobic and hypoxic layers than anaerobic layers, indicating that aerobic denitrifiers might play important roles at these layers.

Citing Articles

Optimizing nitrogen removal in advanced wastewater treatment using biological aerated filters.

Li J, Niu Z, Li L, Zhou S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1463544.

PMID: 39669419 PMC: 11635964. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1463544.


Metagenomic Profile of Microbial Communities in a Drinking Water Storage Tank Sediment after Sequential Exposure to Monochloramine, Free Chlorine, and Monochloramine.

Gomez-Alvarez V, Liu H, Pressman J, Wahman D ACS ES T Water. 2021; 1(5):1283-1294.

PMID: 34337601 PMC: 8318090. DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00016.

References
1.
Song B, Palleroni N, Haggblom M . Isolation and characterization of diverse halobenzoate-degrading denitrifying bacteria from soils and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66(8):3446-53. PMC: 92169. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3446-3453.2000. View

2.
Achenbach L, Michaelidou U, BRUCE R, Fryman J, Coates J . Dechloromonas agitata gen. nov., sp. nov. and Dechlorosoma suillum gen. nov., sp. nov., two novel environmentally dominant (per)chlorate-reducing bacteria and their phylogenetic position. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001; 51(Pt 2):527-533. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-51-2-527. View

3.
Saunders D, Kalff J . Denitrification rates in the sediments of Lake Memphremagog, Canada-USA. Water Res. 2001; 35(8):1897-904. DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00479-6. View

4.
Christensen P, Nielsen L, Revsbech N, Sorensen J . Microzonation of denitrification activity in stream sediments as studied with a combined oxygen and nitrous oxide microsensor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989; 55(5):1234-41. PMC: 184283. DOI: 10.1128/aem.55.5.1234-1241.1989. View

5.
Verhoeven J, Arheimer B, Yin C, Hefting M . Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21(2):96-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.015. View