» Articles » PMID: 31419680

Exploiting OMI NO Satellite Observations to Infer Fossil-fuel CO Emissions from U.S. Megacities

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 17
PMID 31419680
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fossil-fuel CO emissions and their trends in eight U.S. megacities during 2006-2017 are inferred by combining satellite-derived NO emissions with bottom-up city-specific NO-to-CO emission ratios. A statistical model is fit to a collection NO plumes observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), and is used to calculate top-down NO emissions. Decreases in OMI-derived NO emissions are observed across the eight cities from 2006 to 2017 (-17% in Miami to -58% in Los Angeles), and are generally consistent with long-term trends of bottom-up inventories (-25% in Miami to -49% in Los Angeles), but there are some interannual discrepancies. City-specific NO-to-CO emission ratios, used to calculate inferred CO, are estimated through annual bottom-up inventories of NO and CO emissions disaggregated to 1 × 1 km resolution. Over the study period, NO-to-CO emission ratios have decreased by ~40% nationwide (-24% to -51% for our studied cities), which is attributed to a faster reduction in NO when compared to CO due to policy regulations and fuel type shifts. Combining top-down NO emissions and bottom-up NO-to-CO emission ratios, annual fossil-fuel CO emissions are derived. Inferred OMI-based top-down CO emissions trends vary between +7% in Dallas to -31% in Phoenix. For 2017, we report annual fossil-fuel CO emissions to be: Los Angeles 113 ± 49 Tg/yr; New York City 144 ± 62 Tg/yr; and Chicago 55 ± 24 Tg/yr. A study in the Los Angeles area, using independent methods, reported a 2013-2016 average CO emissions rate of 104 Tg/yr and 120 Tg/yr, which suggests that the CO emissions from our method are in good agreement with other studies' top-down estimates. We anticipate future remote sensing instruments - with better spatial and temporal resolution - will better constrain the NO-to-CO ratio and reduce the uncertainty in our method.

Citing Articles

Quantifying NO Emission Sources in Houston, Texas Using Remote Sensing Aircraft Measurements and Source Apportionment Regression Models.

Goldberg D, de Foy B, Nawaz M, Johnson J, Yarwood G, Judd L ACS EST Air. 2024; 1(11):1391-1401.

PMID: 39539465 PMC: 11555634. DOI: 10.1021/acsestair.4c00097.


China's Fossil Fuel CO Emissions Estimated Using Surface Observations of Coemitted NO.

Feng S, Jiang F, Wang H, Liu Y, He W, Wang H Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(19):8299-8312.

PMID: 38690832 PMC: 11097393. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07756.


Toward Better and Healthier Air Quality: Global PM and O Pollution Status and Risk Assessment Based on the New WHO Air Quality Guidelines for 2021.

Liu J, He C, Si Y, Li B, Wu Q, Ni J Glob Chall. 2024; 8(4):2300258.

PMID: 38617028 PMC: 11009431. DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202300258.


Aircraft and satellite observations reveal historical gap between top-down and bottom-up CO emissions from Canadian oil sands.

Wren S, McLinden C, Griffin D, Li S, Cober S, Darlington A PNAS Nexus. 2023; 2(5):pgad140.

PMID: 37168672 PMC: 10165801. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad140.


CO emissions from C40 cities: citywide emission inventories and comparisons with global gridded emission datasets.

Ahn D, Goldberg D, Coombes T, Kleiman G, Anenberg S Environ Res Lett. 2023; 18(3):034032.

PMID: 36873100 PMC: 9971945. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/acbb91.