» Articles » PMID: 31418585

Abaloparatide in Patients with Mild or Moderate Renal Impairment: Results from the ACTIVE Phase 3 Trial

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2019 Aug 17
PMID 31418585
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate, post hoc, the efficacy and safety of abaloparatide by degree of renal impairment. ACTIVE was a phase 3, 18-month, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, placebo-controlled study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who received subcutaneous abaloparatide 80 µg, placebo, or open-label teriparatide 20 µg daily. Patients with serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL or 1.5-2.0 mg/dL with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <37 mL/min, calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula, were excluded. At baseline, 660 patients had eGFR ≥90 mL/min, 1276 had 60 to ˂90 mL/min, and 527 had <60 mL/min. Older age and lower T-scores were associated with greater renal impairment. Among renal-function subgroups, there were no meaningful changes in bone mineral density, fracture risk reduction, or overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the active-treatment arms. Anemia, nausea, hypercalcemia, and upper-respiratory-tract infection tended to be more frequent with increasing renal impairment. Hypercalcemia measured by albumin-adjusted serum calcium occurred significantly less frequently with abaloparatide than teriparatide in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min (3.6% versus 10.9%;  = .008) and in the overall ACTIVE safety population (3.4% versus 6.4%;  = .006). Computed tomography scans in 376 patients revealed no evidence of increased renal calcification. Increased exposure to abaloparatide and teriparatide in patients with renal impairment led to no meaningful differences in efficacy or safety. These results support the use of abaloparatide without dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment, provided those with severe renal impairments are monitored for adverse events.

Citing Articles

The effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone health in chronic kidney disease.

Aleksova J, Ebeling P, Elder G Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025; .

PMID: 39820573 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-024-01083-8.


Clinical Utility of Bone Turnover Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Srisuwarn P, Eastell R, Salam S J Bone Metab. 2024; 31(4):264-278.

PMID: 39701107 PMC: 11658837. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.24.789.


The Efficacy and Safety of Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteopenia/Osteoporosis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trials.

Whitlock R, MacDonald K, Tangri N, Walsh M, Collister D Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024; 11:20543581241283523.

PMID: 39381071 PMC: 11459530. DOI: 10.1177/20543581241283523.


Fracture risk reduction and safety by osteoporosis treatment compared with placebo or active comparator in postmenopausal women: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Handel M, Cardoso I, von Bulow C, Rohde J, Ussing A, Nielsen S BMJ. 2023; 381:e068033.

PMID: 37130601 PMC: 10152340. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068033.


Management of fracture risk in CKD-traditional and novel approaches.

Haarhaus M, Aaltonen L, Cejka D, Cozzolino M, de Jong R, DHaese P Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(3):456-472.

PMID: 36865010 PMC: 9972845. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac230.