» Articles » PMID: 31412948

The Quality of Marriage Index (QMI): a Validation Study in Infertile Patients

Overview
Journal BMC Res Notes
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Aug 16
PMID 31412948
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Infertility can have a considerable effect on a person's marital satisfaction. The Quality of Marriage Index (QMI) is a self-report inventory to measure global perceptions of marital satisfaction. The current study examined the reliability and validity of the Persian language version of QMI in a sample of infertile patients.

Results: The mean QMI total score was 36.54 ± 6.87. The internal consistency of the scale was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.922. All inter-item correlations and item-total correlations were also in acceptable range. The confirmatory factor analysis results provided evidence for unidimensionality of the scale (χ/df = 3.10; GFI = 0.97; CFI = 0.99; NFI = 0.99; RMSEA = 0.091 and SRMR = 0.020). The convergent validity of the QMI was demonstrated via significant correlations with measures of the Relationship Assessment Scale, Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, and Couples Satisfaction Index-4 Item. These correlations also tended to be larger than correlations with measures of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Perceived Stress Scale-4 Item. Among demographic/fertility variables, only infertility duration was negatively correlated to QMI scores. In sum, the QMI is a reliable and valid brief inventory for measuring overall marital satisfaction in infertile patients. Trial registration This was a cross-sectional study (NOT clinical trial); thus, the trail registration number is not required for the present study.

Citing Articles

Pilot trial of a new self-directed psychological intervention for infertility-related distress.

Poulter M, Balsom A, Gordon J Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024; 10(1):111.

PMID: 39152484 PMC: 11328509. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01535-y.


Child marriage and quality of marriage among young married women in a rural district, Lorestan Province, Iran.

Zolfaghary F, Agajani-Delavar M, Adib-Rad H, Bakouei F, Kazem-Aslani M BMC Res Notes. 2024; 17(1):218.

PMID: 39095831 PMC: 11297568. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-06880-y.


Types and Characteristics of Stress Coping in Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment in Korea.

Choi Y, Moon S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36768010 PMC: 9915192. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032648.


Relationship satisfaction, feelings of closeness and annoyance, and linkage in electrodermal activity.

Timmons A, Han S, Chaspari T, Kim Y, Narayanan S, Duong J Emotion. 2023; 23(7):1815-1828.

PMID: 36649159 PMC: 10349898. DOI: 10.1037/emo0001201.


Effects of supportive and conflicting interactions with partners and friends on emotions: Do the source and quality of relationships matter?.

Shin H, Gyeong S Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1020381.

PMID: 36643707 PMC: 9838194. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1020381.


References
1.
McDonald R, Ho M . Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7(1):64-82. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64. View

2.
Ramezanzadeh F, Aghssa M, Abedinia N, Zayeri F, Khanafshar N, Shariat M . A survey of relationship between anxiety, depression and duration of infertility. BMC Womens Health. 2004; 4(1):9. PMC: 534113. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-4-9. View

3.
Funk J, Rogge R . Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. J Fam Psychol. 2008; 21(4):572-83. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572. View

4.
Nazarinia R, Schumm W, White J . Dimensionality and reliability of a modified version of Norton's 1983 Quality Marriage Index among expectant and new Canadian mothers'. Psychol Rep. 2009; 104(2):379-87. DOI: 10.2466/PR0.104.2.379-387. View

5.
Zimmermann T, Scott J, Heinrichs N . Individual and dyadic predictors of body image in women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2009; 19(10):1061-8. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1660. View