» Articles » PMID: 31412381

The Impact of Patient Interactive Systems on the Management of Pain in an Inpatient Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2019 Aug 15
PMID 31412381
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While some published literature exists on the use of interactive patient care systems, the effectiveness of these systems on the management of pain is unclear. To fill this gap in knowledge, we aimed to understand the impact and outcomes of pain management patient interactive systems in an inpatient setting.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted across seven databases, and results were independently screened by two researchers. To extract relevant data, critical appraisal forms were developed and each paper was examined by two experts. Information included patient interactive system category, patient population and number of participants/samples, experiment type, and specific outcome measures.

Results: Out of 58 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 18 were eligible and included in the final qualitative synthesis. Overall, there were two main types of pain management interactive systems within the inpatient setting (standalone systems and integrated platform systems). While systems were diverse especially for integrated platforms, most reported systems were entertainment distraction systems. Reports examined a variety of outcome measures, including changes in patient-reported pain levels, patient engagement, user satisfaction, changes in clinical workflow, and changes in documentation. In the 13 systems measuring pain scores, 12 demonstrated a positive impact on pain level scores.

Conclusion: Pain management systems appear to be effective in lowering patient level scores, but research comparing the effectiveness and efficacy of one type of interactive system versus another in the management of pain is needed. While not conclusive, pain management systems integrated with other technology platforms show potentially promising effects with improving patient communication, education, and self-reporting.

Citing Articles

[Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Smartmonitor-Based Mobile Health in Middle-Aged in Patients Applying the Technology Acceptance Model II].

Joo O, Ha Y J Korean Acad Nurs. 2024; 54(4):620-632.

PMID: 39663624 DOI: 10.4040/jkan.24091.


Clinician Acceptance of Order Sets for Pain Management: A Survey in Two Urban Hospitals.

Liu Y, Hao H, Sharma M, Harris Y, Scofi J, Trepp R Appl Clin Inform. 2022; 13(2):447-455.

PMID: 35477148 PMC: 9045963. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745828.


Construction and Clinical Application Effect of General Surgery Patient-Oriented Nursing Information Platform Using Cloud Computing.

Chen Y, Wang J, Gao W, Yu D, Shou X J Healthc Eng. 2022; 2022:8273701.

PMID: 35368952 PMC: 8975652. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8273701.

References
1.
Symer M, Abelson J, Milsom J, McClure B, Yeo H . A Mobile Health Application to Track Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgery: Results from a Pilot Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21(9):1500-1505. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3482-2. View

2.
Linton S, Shaw W . Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther. 2011; 91(5):700-11. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100330. View

3.
Martorella G, Cote J, Choiniere M . SOULAGE-TAVIE: development and validation of a virtual nursing intervention to promote self-management of postoperative pain after cardiac surgery. Comput Inform Nurs. 2013; 31(4):189-97. DOI: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e3182812d69. View

4.
Aldekhyyel R, Melton G, Hultman G, Pitt M . Using a Bedside Interactive Technology to Solicit and Record Pediatric Pain Reassessments: Parent and Nursing Perspectives on a Novel Workflow. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018; 2017:300-309. PMC: 5961804. View

5.
Neary P, Sung R, Corrigan M, ODonovan M, Cahill R, Redmond H . The benefits of an interactive, individualized online patient pathway for patients undergoing minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Surg Innov. 2010; 17(3):236-41. DOI: 10.1177/1553350610374603. View