» Articles » PMID: 31406612

Deep Learning-Based Electrocardiogram Signal Noise Detection and Screening Model

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 14
PMID 31406612
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Biosignal data captured by patient monitoring systems could provide key evidence for detecting or predicting critical clinical events; however, noise in these data hinders their use. Because deep learning algorithms can extract features without human annotation, this study hypothesized that they could be used to screen unacceptable electrocardiograms (ECGs) that include noise. To test that, a deep learning-based model for unacceptable ECG screening was developed, and its screening results were compared with the interpretations of a medical expert.

Methods: To develop and apply the screening model, we used a biosignal database comprising 165,142,920 ECG II (10-second lead II electrocardiogram) data gathered between August 31, 2016 and September 30, 2018 from a trauma intensive-care unit. Then, 2,700 and 300 ECGs (ratio of 9:1) were reviewed by a medical expert and used for 9-fold cross-validation (training and validation) and test datasets. A convolutional neural network-based model for unacceptable ECG screening was developed based on the training and validation datasets. The model exhibiting the lowest cross-validation loss was subsequently selected as the final model. Its performance was evaluated through comparison with a test dataset.

Results: When the screening results of the proposed model were compared to the test dataset, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the F1-score of the model were 0.93 and 0.80 (sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.89, positive predictive value = 0.74, and negative predictive value = 0.96).

Conclusions: The deep learning-based model developed in this study is capable of detecting and screening unacceptable ECGs efficiently.

Citing Articles

Detection of biomagnetic signals from induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes using deep learning with simulation data.

Yamaguchi T, Adachi Y, Tanida T, Taguchi K, Oka Y, Yoshida T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7296.

PMID: 38538741 PMC: 10973465. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58010-0.


Robust electrocardiogram delineation model for automatic morphological abnormality interpretation.

Nurmaini S, Darmawahyuni A, Rachmatullah M, Firdaus F, Sapitri A, Tutuko B Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13736.

PMID: 37612382 PMC: 10447439. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40965-1.


A Two-Step Approach to Overcoming Data Imbalance in the Development of an Electrocardiography Data Quality Assessment Algorithm: A Real-World Data Challenge.

Kim H, Venkat S, Chang H, Cho Y, Lee J, Koo K Biomimetics (Basel). 2023; 8(1).

PMID: 36975349 PMC: 10046279. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics8010119.


A deep learning model for the classification of atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients.

Chen B, Maslove D, Curran J, Hamilton A, Laird P, Mousavi P Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023; 11(1):2.

PMID: 36635373 PMC: 9837355. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-022-00490-3.


Automation of generative adversarial network-based synthetic data-augmentation for maximizing the diagnostic performance with paranasal imaging.

Kong H, Kim J, Moon H, Park H, Kim J, Lim R Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18118.

PMID: 36302815 PMC: 9613909. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22222-z.


References
1.
Tikkanen P . Nonlinear wavelet and wavelet packet denoising of electrocardiogram signal. Biol Cybern. 1999; 80(4):259-67. DOI: 10.1007/s004220050523. View

2.
Leski J . Robust weighted averaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002; 49(8):796-804. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2002.800757. View

3.
Iravanian S, Tung L . A novel algorithm for cardiac biosignal filtering based on filtered residue method. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002; 49(11):1310-7. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2002.804589. View

4.
Van Mieghem C, Sabbe M, Knockaert D . The clinical value of the ECG in noncardiac conditions. Chest. 2004; 125(4):1561-76. DOI: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1561. View

5.
Ercelebi E . Electrocardiogram signals de-noising using lifting-based discrete wavelet transform. Comput Biol Med. 2004; 34(6):479-93. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00090-8. View