» Articles » PMID: 31406498

Historical-qualitative Analysis of Breastfeeding Trends in Three OECD Countries

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Aug 14
PMID 31406498
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Breastfeeding rates among high income, western countries vary considerably. This research examines three countries, Sweden, Ireland, and the United States, with respect to both public health initiatives and policy initiatives.

Methods: This article uses a historical qualitative analysis of breastfeeding rates over time. It uses the welfare state structure as a framework for understanding the variation in breastfeeding outcomes among these three countries.

Results: With its strong family policies and early adherence to international public health recommendations, Sweden was able to build high rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration. However, Sweden's breastfeeding rates have been declining, which may be a result of increasing encouragement for fathers to take equal leave, and because Sweden is no longer prioritizing breastfeeding in its public health goals. Ireland has experienced rapid growth of both breastfeeding initiation and participation in the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, though its rates still lag behind much of the Western world. The United States has seen increases in participation with the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, but lacks state support in public health and labor policies.

Conclusion: This analysis suggests that in a country with a strong welfare state and early adoption of internationally recommended public policy, breastfeeding is able to flourish. It also suggests that the Baby-Friendly hospital Initiative is a predictor of breastfeeding success.

Citing Articles

Public Health Nurses' Competence Related to Long-Term Breastfeeding in the Context of Maternity and Child Health Clinics.

Ojantausta O, Poyhonen N, Kaunonen M, Huhtala H, Ikonen R Public Health Nurs. 2024; 42(1):221-232.

PMID: 39415511 PMC: 11700924. DOI: 10.1111/phn.13457.


Reliability and validity of the German version of the Iowa infant feeding attitude scale (IIFAS-G) and relations to breastfeeding duration and feeding method.

Suppiger D, Natalucci G, Reinelt T Int Breastfeed J. 2024; 19(1):58.

PMID: 39169418 PMC: 11337571. DOI: 10.1186/s13006-024-00665-6.


Rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States: data insights from the 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Diaz L, Yee L, Feinglass J Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1256432.

PMID: 38192551 PMC: 10773697. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256432.


Australian, Irish, and Swedish women's comfort levels when breastfeeding in public.

Gallagher L, Brady V, Kuliukas L, Dykes C, Rubertsson C, Hauck Y BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2535.

PMID: 38110935 PMC: 10729571. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17472-z.


An exploration of prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy: a scoping review protocol.

McGovern L, Geraghty A, McAuliffe F, OReilly S Open Res Eur. 2023; 2:91.

PMID: 37645344 PMC: 10445816. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.14938.3.


References
1.
Tarrant R, Younger K, Sheridan-Pereira M, White M, Kearney J . The prevalence and determinants of breast-feeding initiation and duration in a sample of women in Ireland. Public Health Nutr. 2009; 13(6):760-70. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009991522. View

2.
Rollins N, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter C, Martines J . Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?. Lancet. 2016; 387(10017):491-504. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2. View

3.
Hofvander Y . Breastfeeding and the Baby Friendly Hospitals Initiative (BFHI): organization, response and outcome in Sweden and other countries. Acta Paediatr. 2005; 94(8):1012-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02038.x. View

4.
Labbok M . Global baby-friendly hospital initiative monitoring data: update and discussion. Breastfeed Med. 2012; 7:210-22. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2012.0066. View

5.
Tarrant R, Kearney J . Session 1: Public health nutrition. Breast-feeding practices in Ireland. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008; 67(4):371-80. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665108008665. View