Marginal Bone Loss 1 Year After Implantation: a Systematic Review for Fixed and Removable Restorations

Overview

Journal Clin Cosmet Investig Dent

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Date 2019 Aug 14

PMID 31406478

Citations 6

Authors

Jennifer Zimmermann

Melanie Sommer

Leticia Grize

Stefan Stubinger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This systematic review analyses the difference of the mean marginal bone loss (MBL) 1 year after implantation depending on the fixation of the restoration. 889 publications on controlled clinical trials were identified, and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 22 studies were selected. Related to fixed restorations, the lowest MBL was 0.05±0.67 mm and the highest 1.37±0.5 mm. The MBL for removable restorations ranged from 0.13±0.35 mm to 1.03±0.65 mm. Three studies analyzed the MBL around implants of overdentures in the lower jaw. The estimate for this restoration type was 0.476 mm (95% CI: -0.305 to 1.258). 19 randomized controlled studies dealt with restorations which were fixed to the implants. The estimate for the mean MBL was 0.459 mm (95% CI: 0.325-0.593). There was a decrease in 1-year implant survival with an increase of 1 mm MBL (-0.083%; 95% CI: -0.179 to 0.0123; =0.083) in fixed restorations. The difference in MBL between fixed and removable restorations was 0.363 mm (95% CI: -0.319 to 1.044; =0.279). This systematic review indicates that implants with fixed and with removable restorations lead to comparable MBL.

Citing Articles

Marginal bone loss and soft tissue health around two-implant mandibular overdenture retained with milled versus selective laser melted cobalt chromium bar: a randomized clinical trial.

El-Asfahani I, Abd El-Moatty R, Mohamed G, Hussein H BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1180.

PMID: 39367394 PMC: 11452941. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04883-6.

Bone remodeling around dental implants after 1-1.5 years of functional loading: A retrospective analysis of two-stage implants.

Maghsoudi P, Slot D, Van der Weijden F Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022; 8(3):680-689.

PMID: 35427440 PMC: 9209788. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.574.

Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study.

Dorj O, Lin C, Salamanca E, Pan Y, Wu Y, Hsu Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3).

PMID: 35162773 PMC: 8835213. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031750.

[Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].

Liang F, Wu M, Zou L Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021; 53(5):970-976.

PMID: 34650304 PMC: 8517672.

Clinical Performance of Implant Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures for Mandibular Edentulism-A Retrospective Study.

Yoo S, Kim S, Heo S, Koak J, Jeon H J Clin Med. 2021; 10(10).

PMID: 34069868 PMC: 8157346. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10102170.

References

. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(1):39-110. View

Taylor T, Belser U . Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 11 Suppl 1:108-25. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1108.x. View

Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, dArchivio D, Di Placido G, Tumini V . Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol. 2002; 72(11):1560-71. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1560. View

Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B . A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 232-3. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.12.x. View

Carlsson G, Kronstrom M, de Baat C, Cune M, Davis D, Garefis P . A survey of the use of mandibular implant overdentures in 10 countries. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17(2):211-7. View

Stellingsma C, Vissink A, Meijer H, Kuiper C, Raghoebar G . Implantology and the severely resorbed edentulous mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004; 15(4):240-8. DOI: 10.1177/154411130401500406. View

Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M . Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17(4):401-10. View

Horwitz J, Machtei E, Zuabi O, Peled M . Amine fluoride/stannous fluoride and chlorhexidine mouthwashes as adjuncts to single-stage dental implants: a comparative study. J Periodontol. 2005; 76(3):334-40. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.334. View

Strietzel F, Reichart P . Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(5):591-600. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01375.x. View

10.

Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompre P, de Grandmont P, Feine J . Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(6):533-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01693.x. View

11.

Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000100. PMC: 2707010. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. View

12.

Park J, Ha S, Kim S, Kim M, Lee J, Lee J . A randomized clinical 1-year trial comparing two types of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(2):228-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01828.x. View

13.

Cannizzaro G, Torchio C, Leone M, Esposito M . Immediate versus early loading of flapless-placed implants supporting maxillary full-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010; 9 Suppl 1(2):127-39. View

14.

Ma S, Tawse-Smith A, Thomson W, Payne A . Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes. Int J Prosthodont. 2010; 23(4):321-32. View

15.

Alsabeeha N, Payne A, De Silva R, Thomson W . Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 22(3):330-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02004.x. View

16.

Cooper L, Raes F, Reside G, Garriga J, Giner Tarrida L, Wiltfang J . Comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes following immediate provisionalization of single-tooth dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 25(6):1222-32. View

17.

Pieri F, Aldini N, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G . Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(1):169-78. View

18.

Grandi T, Garuti G, Guazzi P, Tarabini L, Forabosco A . Survival and success rates of immediately and early loaded implants: 12-month results from a multicentric randomized clinical study. J Oral Implantol. 2011; 38(3):239-49. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00149. View

19.

Tallarico M, Vaccarella A, Marzi G . Clinical and radiological outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage implant placement: 1-year results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011; 4(1):13-20. View

20.

Lai H, Si M, Zhuang L, Shen H, Liu Y, Wismeijer D . Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 24(2):230-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02452.x. View