» Articles » PMID: 31406197

Contrast Sensitivity Isocontours of the Central Visual Field

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Aug 14
PMID 31406197
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Standard automated perimetry (SAP), the most common form of perimetry used in clinical practice, is associated with high test variability, impacting clinical decision making and efficiency. Contrast sensitivity isocontours (CSIs) may reduce test variability in SAP by identifying regions of the visual field with statistically similar patterns of change that can be analysed collectively and allow a point (disease)-to-CSI (normal) comparison in disease assessment as opposed to a point (disease)-to-point (normal) comparison. CSIs in the central visual field however have limited applicability as they have only been described using visual field test patterns with low, 6° spatial sampling. In this study, CSIs were determined within the central 20° visual field using the 10-2 test grid paradigm of the Humphrey Field Analyzer which has a high 2° sampling frequency. The number of CSIs detected in the central 20° visual field was greater than previously reported with low spatial sampling and stimulus size dependent: 6 CSIs for GI, 4 CSIs for GII and GIII, and 3 CSIs for GIV and GV. CSI number and distribution were preserved with age. Use of CSIs to assess visual function in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) found CSI guided analysis detected a significantly greater deviation in sensitivity of AMD eyes from normal compared to a standard clinical pointwise comparison (-1.40 ± 0.15 dB vs -0.96 ± 0.15 dB; p < 0.05). This work suggests detection of CSIs within the central 20° is dependent on sampling strategy and stimulus size and normative distribution limits of CSIs can indicate significant functional deficits in diseases affecting the central visual field such as AMD.

Citing Articles

Spatial Cluster Patterns of Retinal Sensitivity Loss in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration Features.

Trinh M, Kalloniatis M, Alonso-Caneiro D, Nivison-Smith L Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023; 12(9):6.

PMID: 37676679 PMC: 10494986. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.9.6.


The number of examinations required for the accurate prediction of the progression of the central 10-degree visual field test in glaucoma.

Omoto T, Asaoka R, Akagi T, Oishi A, Miyata M, Murata H Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18843.

PMID: 36344722 PMC: 9640563. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23604-z.


Prediction of visual field defects from macular optical coherence tomography in glaucoma using cluster analysis.

Tong J, Alonso-Caneiro D, Kalloniatis M, Zangerl B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022; 42(5):948-964.

PMID: 35598146 PMC: 9544890. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12997.


Clinical Evaluations of Macular Structure-Function Concordance With and Without Drasdo Displacement.

Tong J, Phu J, Alonso-Caneiro D, Khuu S, Kalloniatis M Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(4):18.

PMID: 35438719 PMC: 9034708. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.4.18.


Development of a Spatio-temporal Contrast Sensitivity Test for Clinical Use.

Costa M, Henriques L, Pinho O J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022; 17(1):69-77.

PMID: 35194498 PMC: 8850854. DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v17i1.10172.


References
1.
Yoshioka N, Zangerl B, Nivison-Smith L, Khuu S, Jones B, Pfeiffer R . Pattern Recognition Analysis of Age-Related Retinal Ganglion Cell Signatures in the Human Eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58(7):3086-3099. PMC: 5482244. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21450. View

2.
Jampel H, Singh K, Lin S, Chen T, Francis B, Hodapp E . Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(5):986-1002. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.019. View

3.
Johnson C . Psychophysical factors that have been applied to clinical perimetry. Vision Res. 2013; 90:25-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.005. View

4.
Curcio C, Allen K . Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol. 1990; 300(1):5-25. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903000103. View

5.
Grillo L, Wang D, Ramachandran R, Ehrlich A, De Moraes C, Ritch R . The 24-2 Visual Field Test Misses Central Macular Damage Confirmed by the 10-2 Visual Field Test and Optical Coherence Tomography. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016; 5(2):15. PMC: 4849532. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.15. View