» Articles » PMID: 31404455

Audiovisual Detection at Different Intensities and Delays

Overview
Journal J Math Psychol
Date 2019 Aug 13
PMID 31404455
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the redundant signals task, two target stimuli are associated with the same response. If both targets are presented together, redundancy gains are observed, as compared with single-target presentation. Different models explain these redundancy gains, including race and coactivation models (e.g., the Wiener diffusion superposition model, Schwarz, 1994, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, and the Ornstein Uhlenbeck diffusion superposition model, Diederich, 1995, Journal of Mathematical Psychology). In the present study, two monkeys performed a simple detection task with auditory, visual and audiovisual stimuli of different intensities and onset asynchronies. In its basic form, a Wiener diffusion superposition model provided only a poor description of the observed data, especially of the detection rate (i.e., accuracy or hit rate) for low stimulus intensity. We expanded the model in two ways, by (A) adding a temporal deadline, that is, restricting the evidence accumulation process to a stopping time, and (B) adding a second "nogo" barrier representing target absence. We present closed-form solutions for the mean absorption times and absorption probabilities for a Wiener diffusion process with a drift towards a single barrier in the presence of a temporal deadline (A), and numerically improved solutions for the two-barrier model (B). The best description of the data was obtained from the deadline model and substantially outperformed the two-barrier approach.

Citing Articles

ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks.

Chandrasekaran C, Hawkins G J Neurosci Methods. 2019; 328:108432.

PMID: 31586868 PMC: 6980795. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108432.

References
1.
Meredith M, Nemitz J, Stein B . Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors. J Neurosci. 1987; 7(10):3215-29. PMC: 6569162. View

2.
Otto T, Mamassian P . Noise and correlations in parallel perceptual decision making. Curr Biol. 2012; 22(15):1391-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.031. View

3.
Chandrasekaran C, Lemus L, Trubanova A, Gondan M, Ghazanfar A . Monkeys and humans share a common computation for face/voice integration. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011; 7(9):e1002165. PMC: 3182859. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002165. View

4.
Ditterich J . Evidence for time-variant decision making. Eur J Neurosci. 2007; 24(12):3628-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05221.x. View

5.
Grant K, Walden B, SEITZ P . Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. DOI: 10.1121/1.422788. View