» Articles » PMID: 31399068

The Effectiveness of Financial Intervention Strategies for Reducing Caesarean Section Rates: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Aug 11
PMID 31399068
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The increasing trend of Caesarean section (CS) in childbirth has become a global public health challenge. Previous studies have proposed financial intervention strategies for reducing CS rates by limiting caesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR). This study synthesizes such strategies while evaluating their effectiveness.

Methods: The sources of data for this study are Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. The publication period included in this study is from January 1991 to November 2018. The financial intervention strategies are divide into two categories: healthcare provider interventions and patient interventions. Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was employed to assess the risk of bias of included studies. The outcome of each study was evaluated with Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) through the GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool software.

Results: Nine studies were included in this systematic review: five with high certainty evidence (HCE), three with moderate certainty evidence (MCE), and one with low certainty evidence (LCE). Of the nine studies, seven are centered on the effect of provider-side interventions. Three of the HCE studies found that the diagnosis-related group payment system, risk-adjusted capitation, and equalizing fee for both facilities and physicians were effective intervention strategies. One HCE and one MCE study showed that only equalizing facility fees between vaginal and CS deliveries in healthcare service settings had no significant effect on reducing the CS rate. The MCE study showed that case payment had a negative effect on reducing the CS rates. One LCE study revealed that the effect of a global budget system was uncertain, and one HCE and one MCE study focused on combining both provider and patient-side interventions. However, equalizing fees for vaginal and CS deliveries and a co-payment policy for CDMRs failed to reduce the CS rate.

Conclusions: The effectiveness of risk-adjusted payment methods appears promising and should be the subject of further research. Financial interventions should consider stakeholders' characteristics, especially the personal interests of doctors. Finally, high-quality randomized control trials and comparative studies on different financial intervention methods are needed to confirm or refute previous studies' outcomes.

Citing Articles

Comparative effectiveness of transvaginal repair vs. hysteroscopic resection in patients with symptomatic uterine niche.

Xia W, Wang X, Wang Y, Tian Y, He C, Zhu C Front Surg. 2023; 10:1019237.

PMID: 36843994 PMC: 9947358. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1019237.


Maternal education and racial/ethnic disparities in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean deliveries in the United States.

Eliner Y, Gulersen M, Chervenak F, Lenchner E, Grunebaum A, Phillips K AJOG Glob Rep. 2022; 2(1):100036.

PMID: 36274969 PMC: 9563532. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100036.


Changes in cesarean section rates after introduction of a punitive financial policy in Georgia: A population-based registry study 2017-2019.

Nedberg I, Manjavidze T, Rylander C, Blix E, Skjeldestad F, Anda E PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0271491.

PMID: 35853028 PMC: 9295975. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271491.


Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus hysteroscopic approach in patients with previous cesarean scar defect: a retrospective cohort study.

Zhang Q, Lei L, Zhang A, Zou L, Xu D Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(20):1529.

PMID: 34790735 PMC: 8576701. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-4339.


Is a 'guideline-compliant' primary cesarean delivery associated with a modified risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity?: a clinical evaluation of the 2014 ACOG/SMFM obstetric care consensus statement.

White A, Chambers C, Ertel M, Gennaro T, Chen L, Friedman A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):580.

PMID: 34420526 PMC: 8381590. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04048-1.


References
1.
Brown 3rd H . Physician demand for leisure: implications for cesarean section rates. J Health Econ. 1996; 15(2):233-42. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00039-9. View

2.
Keeler E, Fok T . Equalizing physician fees had little effect on cesarean rates. Med Care Res Rev. 1996; 53(4):465-71. DOI: 10.1177/107755879605300405. View

3.
Vimercati A, Greco P, Kardashi A, Rossi C, Loizzi V, Scioscia M . Choice of cesarean section and perception of legal pressure. J Perinat Med. 2000; 28(2):111-7. DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2000.014. View

4.
Antioch K, Walsh M . Risk-adjusted capitation funding models for chronic disease in Australia: alternatives to casemix funding. Eur J Health Econ. 2004; 3(2):83-93. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-002-0096-7. View

5.
Ndiaye S, Hopkins D, Shefer A, Hinman A, Briss P, Rodewald L . Interventions to improve influenza, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and hepatitis B vaccination coverage among high-risk adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(5 Suppl):248-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.02.016. View