» Articles » PMID: 31398071

Association Between MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Lymphovascular Invasion and Estrogen Receptor Status in Invasive Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Aug 10
PMID 31398071
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is associated with breast cancer risk, but the associations between BPE and clinical characteristics and histological features are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the association between BPE and clinical characteristics (including age, menopausal status, and tumor histological characteristics) in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 163 patients with invasive breast cancer (164 lesions, 1 patient had bilateral cancer) confirmed by surgery and pathological examination, treated between January 2014 and December 2016 at our university (Kunming Medical University). The patients were divided into two groups: extremely minimal and mild enhancement (low BPE group, = 78) moderate and marked enhancement (high BPE group, = 86).

Results: Compared with the low BPE group, the high BPE group showed higher frequencies of patients < 50 years of age (88% 38%, < 0.0001), premenopausal (87% 29%, < 0.0001), T1 staging (35% 15%, = 0.027), Grade II (57% 37%, = 0.03), lymphovascular invasion (83% 13%, < 0.0001), and positive estrogen receptor (ER) (79% 42%, < 0.0001). The Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between BPE and age, menopausal status, lymphovascular invasion, and ER status were -0.521 ( < 0.0001), -0.588 ( < 0.0001), 0.697 ( < 0.0001), and 0.377 ( < 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusion: BPE is negatively associated with age and menopausal status, and is positively associated with lymphovascular invasion and positive ER status.

Advances In Knowledge: BPE is not correlated with T staging and histological classification in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Predictive value of MRI-based deep learning model for lymphovascular invasion status in node-negative invasive breast cancer.

Liang R, Li F, Yao J, Tong F, Hua M, Liu J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16204.

PMID: 39003325 PMC: 11246470. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67217-0.


Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging Modalities.

Acciavatti R, Lee S, Reig B, Moy L, Conant E, Kontos D Radiology. 2023; 306(3):e222575.

PMID: 36749212 PMC: 9968778. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.222575.


MRI-Based Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer.

Nijiati M, Aihaiti D, Huojia A, Abulizi A, Mutailifu S, Rouzi N Front Oncol. 2022; 12:876624.

PMID: 35734595 PMC: 9207467. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.876624.


Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.

Kazama T, Takahara T, Hashimoto J Life (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35454981 PMC: 9028183. DOI: 10.3390/life12040490.


High-background parenchymal enhancement in the contralateral breast is an imaging biomarker for favorable prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Xu C, Yu J, Wu F, Li X, Hu D, Chen G Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(5):4422-4436.

PMID: 34150024 PMC: 8205756.


References
1.
King V, Gu Y, Kaplan J, Brooks J, Pike M, Morris E . Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(12):2641-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2553-8. View

2.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M . Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014; 136(5):E359-86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210. View

3.
Yaghjyan L, Colditz G, Rosner B, Tamimi R . Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: interactions of percent density, absolute dense, and non-dense areas with breast cancer risk factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 150(1):181-9. PMC: 4372799. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3286-6. View

4.
Zhu W, Huang P, Macura K, Artemov D . Association between breast cancer, breast density, and body adiposity evaluated by MRI. Eur Radiol. 2015; 26(7):2308-16. PMC: 4840094. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4058-8. View

5.
Biglia N, Bounous V, Martincich L, Panuccio E, Liberale V, Ottino L . Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011; 37(3):199-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.12.011. View