» Articles » PMID: 31396395

Acceptability and Utilization of Family Planning Benefits Cards by Youth in Slums in Kampala, Uganda

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Aug 10
PMID 31396395
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to test the acceptability and utilization of family planning benefits cards (FPBCs) as incentives to increase family planning uptake among youth living in urban slums in Uganda.

Methods: We conducted a one-year pilot study with two sub-studies on acceptability and utilization of FPBCs. The acceptability study utilized a quantitative cross-sectional design and was part of a baseline household survey while the utilization study was a primary analysis of claims and clinic data. We performed descriptive analyses and analyses of the association between different variables using binary logistic regression.

Results: The acceptability study included 280 eligible females. The majority were married (52%), Christian (87%), and aged 20 and above (84%). Acceptability of the program was high (93%). Seventy-two percent of females used the card at least once to access reproductive health services. Twenty-seven percent of female users discontinued family planning and 14% changed family planning methods during the study. Female users of short-term contraceptive methods were 11 times more likely to discontinue use of FPBCs compared to those who used long-term methods (adjusted OR = 10.9,  = 0.011). Participants in professional/managerial employment were 30 times more likely to discontinue compared to the unemployed (adjusted OR = 30.3,  = 0.015). Participants of parity equal to two were 89% less likely to discontinue use of FPBCs compared to those of parity equal to zero (adjusted OR = 0.1,  = 0.019).

Conclusion: Family planning benefits cards, deployed as incentives to increase uptake of family planning, exhibited high acceptability and utilization by youth in urban slums in Uganda. There was evidence that use of short-term contraception methods, professional employment, and lower parity were associated with discontinuation of modern family planning methods after initial enrolment.

Trial Registration: MUREC1/7 No. 10/05-17. Registered 19th, July 2017.

Citing Articles

Increasing coverage and uptake of voluntary family planning in Uganda's emerging municipalities and secondary cities: An implementation research study protocol.

Kananura R, Birabwa C, Ssanyu J, Kizito F, Kagaha A, Namutanba S PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0293351.

PMID: 38728317 PMC: 11086862. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293351.


Cost-effectiveness of increased contraceptive coverage using family planning benefits cards compared with the standard of care for young women in Uganda.

Nuwamanya E, Babigumira J, Svensson M Contracept Reprod Med. 2023; 8(1):21.

PMID: 36782307 PMC: 9926799. DOI: 10.1186/s40834-022-00206-8.


Disruption in Essential Health Service Delivery: A Qualitative Study on Access to Family Planning Information and Service Utilization During the First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Uganda.

Kabagenyi A, Kyaddondo B, Nyachwo E, Wasswa R, Bwanika J, Kabajungu E Open Access J Contracept. 2022; 13:75-82.

PMID: 35642206 PMC: 9148575. DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S360408.


Decade of research into the acceptability of interventions aimed at improving adolescent and youth health and social outcomes in Africa: a systematic review and evidence map.

Somefun O, Casale M, Haupt Ronnie G, Desmond C, Cluver L, Sherr L BMJ Open. 2021; 11(12):e055160.

PMID: 34930743 PMC: 8689197. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055160.


Knowledge and Information Exposure About Family Planning Among Women of Reproductive Age in Informal Settlements of Kira Municipality, Wakiso District, Uganda.

Birabwa C, Chemonges D, Tetui M, Baroudi M, Namatovu F, Akuze J Front Glob Womens Health. 2021; 2:650538.

PMID: 34816206 PMC: 8594013. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.650538.


References
1.
Machiyama K, Casterline J, Mumah J, Huda F, Obare F, Odwe G . Reasons for unmet need for family planning, with attention to the measurement of fertility preferences: protocol for a multi-site cohort study. Reprod Health. 2017; 14(1):23. PMC: 5299702. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0268-z. View

2.
Starbird E, Norton M, Marcus R . Investing in Family Planning: Key to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016; 4(2):191-210. PMC: 4982245. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00374. View

3.
Munroe E, Hayes B, Taft J . Private-Sector Social Franchising to Accelerate Family Planning Access, Choice, and Quality: Results From Marie Stopes International. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015; 3(2):195-208. PMC: 4476859. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00056. View

4.
Apanga P, Adam M . Factors influencing the uptake of family planning services in the Talensi District, Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2015; 20:10. PMC: 4430143. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.10.5301. View

5.
Babigumira J, Stergachis A, Veenstra D, Gardner J, Ngonzi J, Mukasa-Kivunike P . Potential cost-effectiveness of universal access to modern contraceptives in Uganda. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e30735. PMC: 3281877. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030735. View