Consumers' Responses to Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling: Results from a Sample from The Netherlands

Overview

Journal Nutrients

Date 2019 Aug 9

PMID 31390835

Citations 29

Authors

Manon Egnell

Zenobia Talati

Marion Gombaud

Pilar Galan

Serge Hercberg

Simone Pettigrew

Chantal Julia

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) are efficient tools for helping consumers identify healthier food products. Although discussions on nutritional labelling are currently ongoing in Europe, few studies have compared the effectiveness of FoPLs in European countries, including the Netherlands. This study aimed to compare five FoPLs among Dutch participants (the Health Star Rating (HSR) system, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs), and Warning symbols) in terms of perception and understanding of the labels and food choices. In 2019, 1032 Dutch consumers were recruited and asked to select one product from among a set of three foods with different nutritional profiles, and then rank the products within the sets according to their nutritional quality. These tasks were performed with no label and then with one of the five FoPLs on the package, depending on the randomization arm. Finally, participants were questioned on their perceptions regarding the label to which they were exposed. Regarding perceptions, all FoPLs were favorably perceived but with only marginal differences between FoPLs. While no significant difference across labels was observed for food choices, the Nutri-Score demonstrated the highest overall performance in helping consumers rank the products according to their nutritional quality.

Citing Articles

The Relation between Consumer Perception and Objective Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels (FOPNLs); Results from an Online Representative Survey.

Magriplis E, Marakis G, Panagiotakos D, Samona A, Kotopoulou S, Kouretas D Nutrients. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38892684 PMC: 11174983. DOI: 10.3390/nu16111751.

The Nutri-Score Scale-A Tool for Assessing the Nutritional Quality of Processed Meat Products Available on the Polish Market.

Czech-Zalubska K, Didkowska A, Klich D, Jackowska-Tracz A, Zarzynska J, Anusz K Nutrients. 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38542738 PMC: 10975717. DOI: 10.3390/nu16060827.

A Little Bird Told Me… Nutri-Score Panoramas from a Flight over Europe, Connecting Science and Society.

Stiletto A, Cei L, Trestini S Nutrients. 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37571304 PMC: 10421117. DOI: 10.3390/nu15153367.

Associations Between the Modified Food Standard Agency Nutrient Profiling System Dietary Index and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in an Elderly Population.

Khoury N, Gomez-Donoso C, Martinez M, Martinez-Gonzalez M, Corella D, Fito M Front Nutr. 2022; 9:897089.

PMID: 35967785 PMC: 9364822. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.897089.

Health Literacy and Its Associations with Understanding and Perception of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels among Higher Education Students.

Hoge A, Labeye M, Donneau A, Nekoee H, Husson E, Guillaume M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(14).

PMID: 35886603 PMC: 9319699. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148751.

References

Feunekes G, Gortemaker I, Willems A, Lion R, van den Kommer M . Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite. 2007; 50(1):57-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.05.009. View

Kelly B, Hughes C, Chapman K, Louie J, Dixon H, Crawford J . Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market. Health Promot Int. 2009; 24(2):120-9. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dap012. View

Borgmeier I, Westenhoefer J . Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:184. PMC: 2702386. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-184. View

Sacks G, Rayner M, Swinburn B . Impact of front-of-pack 'traffic-light' nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. Health Promot Int. 2009; 24(4):344-52. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dap032. View

Vyth E, Steenhuis I, Roodenburg A, Brug J, Seidell J . Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7:65. PMC: 2945986. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-65. View

Sacks G, Tikellis K, Millar L, Swinburn B . Impact of 'traffic-light' nutrition information on online food purchases in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011; 35(2):122-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00684.x. View

Carter O, Mills B, Phan T . An independent assessment of the Australian food industry's Daily Intake Guide 'Energy Alone' label. Health Promot J Austr. 2011; 22(1):63-7. DOI: 10.1071/he11063. View

Draper A, Adamson A, Clegg S, Malam S, Rigg M, Duncan S . Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: are multiple formats a problem for consumers?. Eur J Public Health. 2011; 23(3):517-21. PMC: 3662013. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr144. View

Mejean C, Macouillard P, Peneau S, Hercberg S, Castetbon K . Perception of front-of-pack labels according to social characteristics, nutritional knowledge and food purchasing habits. Public Health Nutr. 2012; 16(3):392-402. PMC: 10271327. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980012003515. View

10.

Hersey J, Wohlgenant K, Arsenault J, Kosa K, Muth M . Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers. Nutr Rev. 2013; 71(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1111/nure.12000. View

11.

Mejean C, Macouillard P, Peneau S, Hercberg S, Castetbon K . Consumer acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutrition labels. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013; 26(5):494-503. DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12039. View

12.

Waterlander W, Steenhuis I, de Boer M, Schuit A, Seidell J . Effects of different discount levels on healthy products coupled with a healthy choice label, special offer label or both: results from a web-based supermarket experiment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10:59. PMC: 3668240. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-59. View

13.

Aschemann-Witzel J, Grunert K, van Trijp H, Bialkova S, Raats M, Hodgkins C . Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice. Appetite. 2013; 71:63-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.004. View

14.

van Herpen E, Hieke S, van Trijp H . Inferring product healthfulness from nutrition labelling. The influence of reference points. Appetite. 2014; 72:138-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.012. View

15.

Thorndike A, Riis J, Sonnenberg L, Levy D . Traffic-light labels and choice architecture: promoting healthy food choices. Am J Prev Med. 2014; 46(2):143-9. PMC: 3911887. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.002. View

16.

Bialkova S, Grunert K, Juhl H, Wasowicz-Kirylo G, Stysko-Kunkowska M, van Trijp H . Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers' choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking. Appetite. 2014; 76:66-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.021. View

17.

Dodds P, Wolfenden L, Chapman K, Wellard L, Hughes C, Wiggers J . The effect of energy and traffic light labelling on parent and child fast food selection: a randomised controlled trial. Appetite. 2014; 73:23-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.013. View

18.

van Kleef E, Dagevos H . The growing role of front-of-pack nutrition profile labeling: a consumer perspective on key issues and controversies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014; 55(3):291-303. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2011.653018. View

19.

Maubach N, Hoek J, Mather D . Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations. Appetite. 2014; 82:67-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.006. View

20.

Hamlin R, McNeill L, Moore V . The impact of front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer product evaluation and choice: an experimental study. Public Health Nutr. 2014; 18(12):2126-34. PMC: 10271474. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014002997. View