» Articles » PMID: 31387572

Self-directed Learning and Practice of Italian Osteopathic Students During Summer Break: a Cross-sectional Survey

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Aug 8
PMID 31387572
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Self-directed learning is a student-centered approach based on the students' evaluation about their own learning needs. Self-directed practice is a component of the self-directed learning which focus on achieving manual and practical skills. Given the abundance of manual skills that students need to develop in the osteopathic curriculum, self-directed practice has become an attractive methodology. Most of the Italian osteopathic educational institutions recognize two types of educational curriculum: T1, for students without a healthcare background; and T2 for students who are already healthcare professionals. The aim of the present study is to investigate the attitudes of Italian osteopathic students toward self-directed practice during the summer break highlighting the possible differences between T1 and T2 students.

Methods: A web-based closed-ended survey was administered to the students attending one of the Italian osteopathic educational institutions which accepted to participate in the research.

Results: Two hundred sixty-eight students on 2549 participated to the survey. 64.92% of the students reported to have performed self-directed practice during the summer break. The main difficulty encountered by students in approaching self-directed practice was 'lack of people to exercise with'. Most of the students performed self-directed practice between 1 to 5 h per week. The most common clinical condition encountered was Low Back Pain. The anatomical area most approached was lumbar spine. The most commonly simulated tests were the articular mobility tests. The techniques in which students trained the most were muscle energy techniques. Significant difference was found in self-engagement to the self-directed practice between T1 and T2 students (p = 0.026), and in the reasons to perform self-directed practice (p = 0.027).

Conclusions: The results of this study could be useful to reveal some aspects of students' academic education and future clinical practice. Therefore this paper can be a useful tool for the institutions to develop strategies to overcome the reported problems students have towards self-directed practice. For example it should be discussed the possibility for the students to observe some senior osteopaths during their practice or to plan to maintain an open tutored didactic environment during the summer break as an extracurricular activity.

Citing Articles

Validation of Internal structure of Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale among Indian Medical Students using factor analysis and the Structural equation Modelling Approach.

Kumar A, Omprakash A, Chokkalingam Mani P, Swaminathan N, Maheshkumar K, Maruthy K BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21(1):614.

PMID: 34895214 PMC: 8666083. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-03035-6.


Osteopathy students profile in Italy: A cross sectional census.

Consorti G, Bagagiolo D, Buscemi A, Cicchitti L, Persiani M, Bergna A PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0247405.

PMID: 33626081 PMC: 7904159. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247405.

References
1.
Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick R, McManus I, Darzi A . Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997; 50:124-30. View

2.
Ericsson K . Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004; 79(10 Suppl):S70-81. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022. View

3.
Degenhardt B, Snider K, Snider E, Johnson J . Interobserver reliability of osteopathic palpatory diagnostic tests of the lumbar spine: improvements from consensus training. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005; 105(10):465-73. View

4.
Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M . A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006; 28(6):497-526. DOI: 10.1080/01421590600902976. View

5.
Ericsson K, Prietula M, Cokely E . The making of an expert. Harv Bus Rev. 2007; 85(7-8):114-21, 193. View