» Articles » PMID: 31386576

Athletic Trainers' Practice Patterns Regarding Medical Documentation

Overview
Journal J Athl Train
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Aug 7
PMID 31386576
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Medical documentation is a required component of patient care in all health care professions.

Objective: To evaluate athletic trainers' perceived behaviors toward, barriers to, and confidence in their medical documentation.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Web-based survey.

Patients Or Other Participants: We purchased a list of randomly selected e-mails from the National Athletic Trainers' Association. Of the 9578 participants, 1150 accessed our questionnaire (12.0% access rate), 1053 completed at least 1 portion, and 904 completed the questionnaire in its entirety (85.8% completion rate). Of the participants, 60.1% (n = 569/947) were female, 66.6% (n = 632/949) held a master's degree, 39.3% (n = 414/1053) worked in a collegiate or university setting, and 36.1% (n = 381/1053) worked in a secondary school setting.

Main Outcome Measure(s): We used a 31-item questionnaire with demographics (12 items), medical documentation behaviors (16 items), barriers (2 items), and perceptions (1 multipart item) sections. The questionnaire explored athletic trainers' behaviors as well as confidence in, comfort with, and concerns about their documentation practices (Cronbach α = 0.887). We used descriptive statistics to identify characteristics of central tendency (mean, standard deviation, mode, frequency).

Results: Participants always (45.7%, n = 478/1046) or very frequently (39.0%, n = 408/1046) used a double documentation system consisting of electronic and paper records (50.4%, n = 523/1038). They most often documented to provide legal protection (86.8%, n = 914/1053), because it is a legal obligation (79.1%, n = 833/1053), or to track patient progress (83.9%, n = 883/1053). The most frequently cited barriers to medical documentation were time (76.5%, n = 806/1053), managing too many patients (51.9%, n = 547/1053), technological concerns (17.2%, n = 181/1053), and software limitations (17.2%, n = 181/1053). Respondents believed they were competent, comfortable, and confident in their documentation practices.

Conclusions: We were able to evaluate the generalizability of previous research while adding to the understanding of the behaviors toward, barriers to, and perceptions about medical documentation. We confirmed that time and patient load affected the ability to perform high-quality medical documentation.

Citing Articles

National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Emergency Action Plan Development and Implementation in Sport.

Scarneo-Miller S, Hosokawa Y, Drezner J, Hirschhorn R, Conway D, Elkins G J Athl Train. 2024; 59(6):570-583.

PMID: 38918009 PMC: 11220767. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0521.23.


Improving Athletic Trainers' Knowledge of Clinical Documentation Through Novel Educational Interventions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kasamatsu T, Nottingham S, Bay R, Welch Bacon C J Athl Train. 2024; 59(9):969-978.

PMID: 38291774 PMC: 11440816. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0407.23.


Athletic Trainers' Perceptions of and Experiences With Professional Development Approaches for Enhancing Clinical Documentation.

Nottingham S, Kasamatsu T, Cavallario J, Welch Bacon C J Athl Train. 2023; 59(8):857-867.

PMID: 38069830 PMC: 11340666. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0408.23.


Organizational Expectations Regarding Documentation Practices in Athletic Training.

Devenney J, Drescher M, Rivera M, Neil E, Eberman L J Athl Train. 2023; 59(2):212-222.

PMID: 37459373 PMC: 10895392. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0062.23.


Epidemiology of Injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association Women's Tennis: 2014-2015 Through 2018-2019.

Robison H, Boltz A, Morris S, Collins C, Chandran A J Athl Train. 2021; 56(7):766-772.

PMID: 34280290 PMC: 8293885. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-529-20.


References
1.
Zierler-Brown S, Brown T, Chen D, Blackburn R . Clinical documentation for patient care: models, concepts, and liability considerations for pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007; 64(17):1851-8. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp060682. View

2.
Buhi E, Goodson P, Neilands T . Out of sight, not out of mind: strategies for handling missing data. Am J Health Behav. 2007; 32(1):83-92. DOI: 10.5555/ajhb.2008.32.1.83. View

3.
Snyder A, Parsons J, Valovich McLeod T, Bay R, Michener L, Sauers E . Using disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice, part I: disablement models. J Athl Train. 2008; 43(4):428-36. PMC: 2474823. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.4.428. View

4.
Valovich McLeod T, Snyder A, Parsons J, Bay R, Michener L, Sauers E . Using disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice, part II: clinical outcomes assessment. J Athl Train. 2008; 43(4):437-45. PMC: 2474824. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.4.437. View

5.
Valovich McLeod T, Lam K, Bay R, Sauers E, Snyder Valier A . Practice-based research networks, part II: a descriptive analysis of the athletic training practice-based research network in the secondary school setting. J Athl Train. 2012; 47(5):557-66. PMC: 3465037. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.5.05. View