» Articles » PMID: 31384423

Postmarket Surveillance: a Review on Key Aspects and Measures on the Effective Functioning in the Context of the United Kingdom and Canada

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2019 Aug 7
PMID 31384423
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regulatory approvals for the marketing of medicinal products authorize medical practitioners to prescribe drugs to a group of patients that are defined within the license of the medicinal product. However, such prescriptions are carried out in a controlled manner. Prior to being approved, the medicinal product will have been evaluated in a population pool containing fewer than 5,000 patients and in a predesigned environment where several factors may be lacking, such as the absence of women of childbearing potential, geriatric patients and paediatric patients. Therefore, it is not surprising that several major adverse drug reactions are detected only when the product has been prescribed to the general population. National and international regulatory bodies have devised systems for monitoring medicinal products after marketing, commonly known as postmarketing surveillance systems. Postmarketing surveillance refers to the process of monitoring the safety of drugs once they reach the market, after the successful completion of clinical trials. The primary purpose for conducting postmarketing surveillance is to identify previously unrecognized adverse effects as well as positive effects. The Yellow Card scheme, practiced in the United Kingdom and the Canada Vigilance Program adopted in the Canadian jurisdiction, are two of the most successful postmarketing surveillance systems implemented across the world. Therefore, this article intends to discuss postmarketing surveillance and its role in the context of the United Kingdom and Canadian jurisdictions with a view on presenting key aspects and measures that are employed for operating an efficient postmarketing surveillance system in regulated markets.

Citing Articles

Drug repurposing for Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Cummings J, Zhou Y, Van Stone A, Cammann D, Tonegawa-Kuji R, Fonseca J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1755.

PMID: 39971900 PMC: 11840136. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56690-4.


Antibiotics-induced pulmonary embolism: A disproportionality analysis in Food and Drug Administration database of Adverse Event Reporting System using data mining algorithms.

Adusumilli P, Begum F, Sangnure A, George J Perspect Clin Res. 2025; 16(1):44-49.

PMID: 39867523 PMC: 11759233. DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_10_24.


Editorial: Pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance post-marketing drug safety studies.

Khan Z, Karatas Y, Akici A, Martins M, Ahmad N Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1473052.

PMID: 39228524 PMC: 11368867. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1473052.


Mitophagy and cGAS-STING crosstalk in neuroinflammation.

Zhou X, Wang J, Yu L, Qiao G, Qin D, Law B Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024; 14(8):3327-3361.

PMID: 39220869 PMC: 11365416. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.05.012.


Bridging the gap from medical to psychological safety assessment: consensus study in a digital mental health context.

Taher R, Bhanushali P, Allan S, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Bolton H, Dennison L BJPsych Open. 2024; 10(4):e126.

PMID: 38828683 PMC: 11363077. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.713.


References
1.
Edwards I, Aronson J . Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000; 356(9237):1255-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9. View

2.
Gough S . Post-marketing surveillance: a UK/European perspective. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005; 21(4):565-70. DOI: 10.1185/030079905X41426. View

3.
Blenkinsopp A, Wilkie P, Wang M, Routledge P . Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 63(2):148-56. PMC: 2000570. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02746.x. View

4.
Anderson C, Gifford A, Avery A, Fortnum H, Murphy E, Krska J . Assessing the usability of methods of public reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK Yellow Card Scheme. Health Expect. 2011; 15(4):433-40. PMC: 5060635. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00686.x. View

5.
Avery A, Anderson C, Bond C, Fortnum H, Gifford A, Hannaford P . Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys. Health Technol Assess. 2011; 15(20):1-234, iii-iv. DOI: 10.3310/hta15200. View