» Articles » PMID: 31384420

The Road from Intermittently Scanned Glucose Monitoring to Hybrid Closed-loop Systems: Part A. Keys to Success: Subject Profiles, Choice of Systems, Education

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2019 Aug 7
PMID 31384420
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Managing type 1 diabetes (T1DM) is challenging and requires intensive glucose monitoring and titration of insulin in order to reduce the risk of complications. The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, either flash or intermittently scanned glucose monitoring (isCGM) or real-time (RT) CGM, has positively affected the management of type 1 diabetes with the potential to lower HbA1c, enhance time spent in range, reduce frequency and time spent in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, lower glycemic variability, and improve quality of life. In recent years, both CGM and pump technology have advanced, with improved functional features and integration, including low glucose suspend (LGS), predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS), and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems. In this review, we highlight the benefits and limitations of use of isCGM/RT-CGM for open-loop control and recent progress in closed-loop control systems. We also discuss different subject profiles for the different systems, and focus on educational aspects that are key to successful use of the systems.

Citing Articles

The Reporting Quality of Machine Learning Studies on Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.

Zrubka Z, Kertesz G, Gulacsi L, Czere J, Holgyesi A, Nezhad H J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e47430.

PMID: 38241075 PMC: 10837761. DOI: 10.2196/47430.


Impact on glucometric variables and quality of life of the advanced hybrid closed-loop system in pediatric and adolescent type 1 diabetes.

Lendinez-Jurado A, Gomez-Perea A, Ariza-Jimenez A, Tapia-Ceballos L, Becerra-Paz I, Martos-Lirio M J Diabetes. 2023; 15(8):699-708.

PMID: 37337407 PMC: 10415871. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13426.


Insulin pumps in children - a systematic review.

Al-Beltagi M, Saeed N, Bediwy A, Elbeltagi R World J Clin Pediatr. 2022; 11(6):463-484.

PMID: 36439904 PMC: 9685680. DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v11.i6.463.


A review of flash glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes.

Krakauer M, Botero J, Lavalle-Gonzalez F, Proietti A, Barbieri D Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021; 13(1):42.

PMID: 33836819 PMC: 8035716. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-021-00654-3.


Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews.

Diez-Fernandez A, Rodriguez-Huerta M, Miron-Gonzalez R, Laredo-Aguilera J, Martin-Espinosa N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(6).

PMID: 33803558 PMC: 8003041. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063123.


References
1.
Tamborlane W, Beck R, Bode B, Buckingham B, Peter Chase H, Clemons R . Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(14):1464-76. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. View

2.
De Block C, Manuel-y-Keenoy B, Van Gaal L . A review of current evidence with continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009; 2(4):718-27. PMC: 2769750. DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200426. View

3.
Bergenstal R, Tamborlane W, Ahmann A, Buse J, Dailey G, Davis S . Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(4):311-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002853. View

4.
Hermanides J, Norgaard K, Bruttomesso D, Mathieu C, Frid A, Dayan C . Sensor-augmented pump therapy lowers HbA(1c) in suboptimally controlled Type 1 diabetes; a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2011; 28(10):1158-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03256.x. View

5.
Riveline J, Schaepelynck P, Chaillous L, Renard E, Sola-Gazagnes A, Penfornis A . Assessment of patient-led or physician-driven continuous glucose monitoring in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes using basal-bolus insulin regimens: a 1-year multicenter study. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35(5):965-71. PMC: 3329830. DOI: 10.2337/dc11-2021. View