» Articles » PMID: 31379937

Prevalence of Dermatophytosis and Antifungal Activity of Ethanolic Crude Leaf Extract of Against Dermatophytes Isolated from Patients Attending Kampala International University Teaching Hospital, Uganda

Abstract

Dermatophyte infections are a global health problem but neglected in Uganda. This work aimed at determining prevalence of dermatophytosis and antifungal activity of ethanolic crude leaf extract of against dermatophytes isolated from patients attending Kampala International University Teaching Hospital (KIU-TH), Uganda. A total of 100 samples of skin and nail scrapings were collected and processed using standard microscopy (KOH) and cultural methods. leaves were collected and processed with 95% ethanol using standard extraction method. The crude leaves ethanolic extract was tested against three dermatophytes: , and using modified agar well diffusion method. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of the ethanolic leaves crude extract were also determined using broth tube dilution and culture, respectively. Out of 100 samples collected, 49 (49%, 95%CI: 0.3930-0.5876) were found positive for microscopy. The prevalence of dermatophytosis was significantly (p=0.001) associated with age groups of participants with higher infection among those aged 11-20 and 21-30 years with 75.0% each. Out of the 49 that were positive by microscopy, 28 (57.15%, 95% CI: 0.1987-0.3739) were positive by culture. Thirty-one (31) fungal isolates were obtained which included both dermatophyte and non-dermatophyte fungi. had highest distribution 6 (19.35%) among dermatophytes species while spp. were found to have highest distribution 7 (22.58%) among non-dermatophyte species. The result of the antidermatophytic test showed that ethanolic crude leaves extract had activity against tested dermatophytes at 1 g/ml. MIC and MFC of the crude extract of against tested dermatophytes ranged from 62.5 to 250 mg/ml and 125 to 500 mg/ml, respectively. The findings of this study reported the presence of dermatophytes causing dermatophytosis among patients attending KIU-TH. The results of the current study showed that leaves ethanolic crude extract has antidermatophytic activity against tested dermatophytes.

Citing Articles

Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical and Pharmacological Investigations of (Hochst.) Codd (Lamiaceae).

Panda S, Gazim Z, Swain S, Vieira de Araujo Bento M, Sena J, Mukazayire M Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:896078.

PMID: 35721148 PMC: 9201335. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.896078.


An Insight into Biomolecules for the Treatment of Skin Infectious Diseases.

Felgueiras H Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(7).

PMID: 34371704 PMC: 8309093. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071012.


Genetic Predisposition and its Heredity in the Context of Increased Prevalence of Dermatophytoses.

Gnat S, Lagowski D, Nowakiewicz A Mycopathologia. 2021; 186(2):163-176.

PMID: 33523393 PMC: 8106586. DOI: 10.1007/s11046-021-00529-1.


Epidemiological Characterization of Dermatomycosis in Ethiopia.

Araya S, Abuye M, Negesso A Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021; 14:83-89.

PMID: 33519223 PMC: 7837531. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S292286.

References
1.
Thappa D . Common skin problems. Indian J Pediatr. 2002; 69(8):701-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02722708. View

2.
Santos D, Hamdan J . Evaluation of broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing conditions for Trichophyton rubrum. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(4):1917-20. PMC: 1081377. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1917-1920.2005. View

3.
Gupta R, Ramnani P . Microbial keratinases and their prospective applications: an overview. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 70(1):21-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-005-0239-8. View

4.
Ahmad I, Aqil F . In vitro efficacy of bioactive extracts of 15 medicinal plants against ESbetaL-producing multidrug-resistant enteric bacteria. Microbiol Res. 2006; 162(3):264-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.06.010. View

5.
Khan S, Singhal S, Mathur T, Upadhyay D, Rattan A . Antifungal susceptibility testing method for resource constrained laboratories. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006; 24(3):171-6. View