Measurement Properties of the NeuroFlexor Device for Quantifying Neural and Non-neural Components of Wrist Hyper-Resistance in Chronic Stroke

Overview

Journal Front Neurol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2019 Aug 6

PMID 31379705

Citations 12

Authors

Aukje Andringa

Erwin van Wegen

Ingrid van de Port

Gert Kwakkel

Carel Meskers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Differentiating between the components of wrist hyper-resistance post stroke, i.e., pathological neuromuscular activation ("spasticity") and non-neural biomechanical changes, is important for treatment decisions. This study aimed to assess the reliability and construct validity of an innovative measurement device that quantifies these neural and non-neural components by biomechanical modeling. Forty-six patients with chronic stroke and 30 healthy age-matched subjects were assessed with the NeuroFlexor, a motor-driven device that imposes isokinetic wrist extensions at two controlled velocities (5 and 236°/s). Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and smallest detectable changes (SDC), and construct validity by testing the difference between patients and healthy subjects and between subgroups of patients stratified by modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and the association with clinical scales. Test-retest reliability was excellent for the neural (NC) and non-neural elastic (EC) components (ICC 0.93 and 0.95, respectively), and good for the viscous component (VC) (ICC 0.84), with SDCs of 10.3, 3.1, and 0.5 N, respectively. NC and EC were significantly higher in patients compared to healthy subjects ( < 0.001). Components gradually increased with MAS category. NC and EC were positively associated with the MAS ( 0.60 and 0.52, respectively; < 0.01), and NC with the Tardieu scale ( 0.36, < 0.05). NC and EC were negatively associated with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity and action research arm test ( ≤ -0.38, < 0.05). The NeuroFlexor reliably quantifies neural and non-neural components of wrist hyper-resistance in chronic stroke, but is less suitable for clinical evaluation at individual level due to high SDC values. Although construct validity has been demonstrated, further investigation at component level is needed.

Citing Articles

Botulinum Toxin-A High-Dosage Effect on Functional Outcome and Spasticity-Related Pain in Subjects with Stroke.

Intiso D, Centra A, Gravina M, Chiaramonte A, Bartolo M, Di Rienzo F Toxins (Basel). 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37624266 PMC: 10467116. DOI: 10.3390/toxins15080509.

Measuring resistance to externally induced movement of the wrist joint in chronic stroke patients using an objective hand-held dynamometer.

Mahmoud W, Haugland M, Ramos-Murguialday A, Hultborn H, Ziemann U Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2023; 8:97-110.

PMID: 37273789 PMC: 10238875. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2023.05.001.

System identification: a feasible, reliable and valid way to quantify upper limb motor impairments.

van de Ruit M, van der Velden L, Onneweer B, Benner J, Haarman C, Ribbers G J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):67.

PMID: 37231496 PMC: 10210505. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01192-x.

Examining the role of intrinsic and reflexive contributions to ankle joint hyper-resistance treated with botulinum toxin-A.

Vant Veld R, Flux E, VAN Oorschot W, Schouten A, van der Krogt M, van der Kooij H J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):19.

PMID: 36750869 PMC: 9906865. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01141-8.

Quantitative measurement of resistance force and subsequent attenuation during passive isokinetic extension of the wrist in patients with mild to moderate spasticity after stroke.

Kawamura K, Etoh S, Noma T, Hayashi R, Jonoshita Y, Natsume K J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022; 19(1):110.

PMID: 36224659 PMC: 9559851. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01087-3.

References

Pandyan A, Johnson G, Price C, Curless R, Barnes M, Rodgers H . A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1191/026921599677595404. View

Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S . The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7(1):13-31. View

Gracies J . Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. I: Paresis and soft tissue changes. Muscle Nerve. 2005; 31(5):535-51. DOI: 10.1002/mus.20284. View

Voerman G, Gregoric M, Hermens H . Neurophysiological methods for the assessment of spasticity: the Hoffmann reflex, the tendon reflex, and the stretch reflex. Disabil Rehabil. 2005; 27(1-2):33-68. DOI: 10.1080/09638280400014600. View

Koo T, Mak A . A neuromusculoskeletal model to simulate the constant angular velocity elbow extension test of spasticity. Med Eng Phys. 2005; 28(1):60-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.03.012. View

Starsky A, Sangani S, McGuire J, Logan B, Schmit B . Reliability of biomechanical spasticity measurements at the elbow of people poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(8):1648-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.015. View

Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D, Grundmann K, Zange C, Koch R . Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19(7):751-9. DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr889oa. View

Patrick E, Ada L . The Tardieu Scale differentiates contracture from spasticity whereas the Ashworth Scale is confounded by it. Clin Rehabil. 2006; 20(2):173-82. DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr922oa. View

Pandyan A, van Wijck F, Stark S, Vuadens P, Johnson G, Barnes M . The construct validity of a spasticity measurement device for clinical practice: an alternative to the Ashworth scales. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28(9):579-85. DOI: 10.1080/09638280500242390. View

10.

Haugh A, Pandyan A, Johnson G . A systematic review of the Tardieu Scale for the measurement of spasticity. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28(15):899-907. DOI: 10.1080/09638280500404305. View

11.

Dietz V, Sinkjaer T . Spastic movement disorder: impaired reflex function and altered muscle mechanics. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6(8):725-33. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70193-X. View

12.

Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer S . A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 22(1):78-90. DOI: 10.1177/1545968307305353. View

13.

Sorinola I, White C, Rushton D, Newham D . Electromyographic response to manual passive stretch of the hemiplegic wrist: accuracy, reliability, and correlation with clinical spasticity assessment and function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 23(3):287-94. DOI: 10.1177/1545968308321778. View

14.

Fleuren J, Voerman G, Erren-Wolters C, Snoek G, Rietman J, Hermens H . Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009; 81(1):46-52. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.177071. View

15.

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D . The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):737-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006. View

16.

Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H . Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010; 85(4):935-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x. View

17.

Nijland R, Wegen E, Verbunt J, van Wijk R, van Kordelaar J, Kwakkel G . A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42(7):694-6. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0560. View

18.

de Vlugt E, De Groot J, Schenkeveld K, Arendzen J, van der Helm F, Meskers C . The relation between neuromechanical parameters and Ashworth score in stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010; 7:35. PMC: 2927906. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-35. View

19.

Sullivan K, Tilson J, Cen S, Rose D, Hershberg J, Correa A . Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2010; 42(2):427-32. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592766. View

20.

Lindberg P, Gaverth J, Islam M, Fagergren A, Borg J, Forssberg H . Validation of a new biomechanical model to measure muscle tone in spastic muscles. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25(7):617-25. DOI: 10.1177/1545968311403494. View