» Articles » PMID: 31379701

Drug Holiday of Interferon Beta 1b in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot, Randomized, Single Blind Study of Non-inferiority

Abstract

To compare a schedule with cyclic withdrawal (CW) of interferon beta (IFN-b) 1b, respect to the full regimen (FR), in relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS). Participants were randomly assigned to CW or FR schedule and monthly monitored with brain MRI scans for 12 months (three of run-in and 9 of treatment). CW schedule included drug withdrawal for 1 month after two of treatment for a total of three quarters over the 9-month treatment period. The assessing neurologist and the expert neuroradiologists were blind. After the blind phase of the study all participants took their indicated disease modifying therapies in a prospectively planned, open-label extension phase (up to 120 months). Of 60 randomized subjects 56 (29 in FR and 27 in CW group) completed the single-blind phase: the two groups were comparable, except for a non-significant difference in the number of contrast-enhanced lesions (CEL) at the end of run-in. The two-sided 90% CI for the ratio between median number of cumulative CEL was 0.29-1.07, allowing to significantly reject the null hypothesis of a ratio ≥1.2 and to meet the primary end-point of non-inferiority (the threshold and the ratio between median were chosen according to the non-normal distribution of the data). The differences (CW vs. FR) were also non-significant for secondary end points: mean cumulative number of T2-weighted new and enlarging lesions (3.48 ± 5.34 vs. 3.86 ± 6.76); mean number and volume (cm) of black holes (1.24 ± 1.61 vs. 2.71 ± 4.56; 489.11 ± 1488.12 vs. 204.48 ± 396.98); number of patients with at least an active scan (21 vs. 22); mean relapse rate (0.52 ± 0.89 vs. 0.34 ± 0.66), relapse risk ratio adjusted for baseline variables (2.15 [0.64-7.18]), EDSS score (1.0 [1-1.56] vs. 1.5 [1-1.78]), proportion of patients with antibodies anti-IFN (5 [21%] vs. 8 [36%]). Fifty-four patients (27 for each study arm) completed the open-label phase. The annualized RR, EDSS, proportion of patients shifting to progressive disease and hazard ratio of shifting, adjusting for baseline covariates, were comparable between the two study groups. A calendar with CW was non-inferior than FR at the beginning of IFN-b therapy, and may not affect the long-term outcome. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT00270816.

Citing Articles

Medication holidays in osteoporosis: evidence-based recommendations from the Italian guidelines on 'Diagnosis, risk stratification, and continuity of care of fragility fractures' based on a systematic literature review.

Migliaccio S, Moretti A, Biffi A, Ronco R, Porcu G, Adami G Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023; 15:1759720X231177110.

PMID: 37359175 PMC: 10286165. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X231177110.


The value of Interferon β in multiple sclerosis and novel opportunities for its anti-viral activity: a narrative literature review.

Bellucci G, Albanese A, Rizzi C, Rinaldi V, Salvetti M, Ristori G Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1161849.

PMID: 37334371 PMC: 10275407. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1161849.


Facing the urgency of therapies for progressive MS - a Progressive MS Alliance proposal.

Dangond F, Donnelly A, Hohlfeld R, Lubetzki C, Kohlhaas S, Leocani L Nat Rev Neurol. 2021; 17(3):185-192.

PMID: 33483719 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-00446-9.


Overcoming Compensatory Mechanisms toward Chronic Drug Administration to Ensure Long-Term, Sustainable Beneficial Effects.

Ilan Y Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2020; 18:335-344.

PMID: 32671136 PMC: 7341037. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.06.006.


Three Decades of Interferon-β in Multiple Sclerosis: Can We Repurpose This Information for the Management of SARS-CoV2 Infection?.

Severa M, Farina C, Salvetti M, Coccia E Front Immunol. 2020; 11:1459.

PMID: 32655578 PMC: 7326001. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01459.

References
1.
Bertolotto A, Malucchi S, Milano E, Castello A, Capobianco M, Mutani R . Interferon beta neutralizing antibodies in multiple sclerosis: neutralizing activity and cross-reactivity with three different preparations. Immunopharmacology. 2000; 48(2):95-100. DOI: 10.1016/s0162-3109(00)00182-x. View

2.
McDonald W, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung H, Lublin F . Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001; 50(1):121-7. DOI: 10.1002/ana.1032. View

3.
. Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001; 52(3):223-8. PMC: 2014556. DOI: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01397-3.x. View

4.
Grossberg S, KAWADE Y, Kohase M, Klein J . The neutralization of interferons by antibody. II. Neutralizing antibody unitage and its relationship to bioassay sensitivity: the tenfold reduction unit. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2001; 21(9):743-55. DOI: 10.1089/107999001753124471. View

5.
Bagnato F, Jeffries N, Richert N, Stone R, Ohayon J, McFarland H . Evolution of T1 black holes in patients with multiple sclerosis imaged monthly for 4 years. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 8):1782-9. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg182. View