» Articles » PMID: 31373737

Effects of Different Diets on the Intestinal Microbiota and Immunity of Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio)

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 3
PMID 31373737
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: An 8-week trial was performed to evaluate the differences in the intestinal microbiota and immune function of common carp (Cyprinus carpio)-fed different diets.

Methods And Results: The fish (initial weight 492·6 ± 30 g, n = 270) were randomly divided into three groups with three replicates and were fed earthworms (group A), earthworms + duckweed (group M) or duckweed (group P) respectively. The diversity and dominant microbiota of the intestinal bacteria were detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and the abundance of dominant bacteria was quantified by qPCR. Additionally, the activities of some nonspecific immune enzymes and antioxidant enzymes were determined. The results showed that higher diversity and abundance of intestinal microbiota were observed in group M and group P (P < 0·05). Based on the intestinal microbiota, Cetobacterium was only detected in the intestines of common carp in group A, and Bacillus was identified in groups M and P. Additionally, a higher abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes was also found in the intestine in group P than in group A (P < 0·05). Interestingly, the higher activities of immune enzymes were detected in intestine of common carp in group M, such as acid phosphatase, phosphatase (AKP), lysozyme, total antioxidant capacity, superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase. In addition, the lower level of metabolites were also detected, such as nitric oxide and malondialdehyde.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that the intestinal microbiota and intestinal immunity of common carp were affected by diet. Meanwhile, the results show that a mixed diet can promote and improve the immune function of the omnivorous carp intestine, which suggests that paddy fields might be more suitable for the intestinal health and animal welfare of omnivorous fishes because they contain plant and animal diets.

Significance And Impact Of The Study: As an ecological aquaculture strategy, the rice-fish mode has attracted attention among farmers, researchers and even consumers, especially for the cultivation of common carp in paddy fields. In paddy fields, fish can eat plant- and animal-based diets. However, it is not clear whether common carp feeding on a mixed diet in paddy fields have better intestinal health. This experiment is one of only a few studies performed from the perspective of intestinal micro-organisms and immunity to successfully study the effects of different natural diets on adult common carp. This study also provides a theoretical basis for healthy breeding of common carp in paddy fields.

Citing Articles

Rice-Fish Farming Improved Antioxidant Defences, Glucose Metabolism, and Muscle Nutrient of in Sichuan Province.

Yan T, Xie Y, Zhou B, Kuang X, Li Q, Zhao F Metabolites. 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 39728491 PMC: 11679335. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14120710.


A Comparative Study on the Muscle and Gut Microbiota of from Rice Field and Pond Culture Breeding Modes.

Zhou F, Bu W, Fan H, Guo S, Qi M, Yao G Metabolites. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39195539 PMC: 11356068. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14080443.


Comparative Analysis of Physiological Responses and Intestinal Microbiota in Juvenile Soft-Shelled Turtle () Fed Four Types of Dietary Carbohydrates.

Sun H, Zhang Y, Ren T, Gao Q, Shi X, Li X Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38929400 PMC: 11200370. DOI: 10.3390/ani14121781.


Characterization and Dynamics of the Gut Microbiota in Rice Fishes at Different Developmental Stages in Rice-Fish Coculture Systems.

Tao L, Chai J, Liu H, Huang W, Zou Y, Wu M Microorganisms. 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36557627 PMC: 9787495. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10122373.


Effects of the Replacement of Dietary Fish Meal with Defatted Yellow Mealworm () on Juvenile Large Yellow Croakers () Growth and Gut Health.

Zhang J, Dong Y, Song K, Wang L, Li X, Tan B Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(19).

PMID: 36230400 PMC: 9559568. DOI: 10.3390/ani12192659.