Electrochemical Characteristics of Microelectrode Designed for Electrical Stimulation

Overview

Journal Biomed Eng Online

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2019 Aug 3

PMID 31370902

Citations 7

Authors

Hongyan Cui

Xiaobo Xie

Shengpu Xu

Leanne L H Chan

Yong Hu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Microelectrode arrays play an important role in prosthetic implants for neural signal recording or applying electrical pulses stimulation to target nerve system. Safety and long-term reliability are essential requirements for microelectrode arrays applied in electrical stimulation. In design and fabrication of the microelectrode array, soft materials are generally chosen to be the substrate for the aim of achieving better compliance with the surrounding tissue while maintaining minimal damage. By flexing of the array to the surface, the array is capable of keeping a more stable electrical contact resulting in a significantly improved signal detected.

Methods: In this study, we design and fabricate a flexible microelectrode array with gold as the electrode material and parylene-C as the substrate. The fabrication process of the array is presented. The in vitro electrochemical characteristics of the microelectrode are investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry in a three-electrode electrochemical cell containing phosphate-buffered saline. Charge injection capacity measurements are carried out by multichannel systems and the CSC of the microarray is calculated.

Results: Electrochemical results showed that impedance decreased with frequency. The average impedance of the Au electrodes at 1 kHz was 36.54 ± 0.88 kΩ. The average phase angle at 1 kHz was - 73.52 ± 1.3°, and the CIC of the microelectrode was 22.3 µC/cm. The results demonstrated that the microelectrode array performed as expected for neuronal signal recording or stimulation.

Conclusions: With parylene-C as the substrate, the microarray has good flexibility. The electrochemical characteristics' results show that the array has the ability to resist any corrosion on metal-electrolyte interface and has good biocompatibility. This low-cost, flexible parylene-based, gold microelectrode array shows potential for use in implant neurological signal acquisition or neurostimulation applications.

Citing Articles

A Study of the Long-Term Electrochemical Stability of Thin-Film Titanium-Platinum Microelectrodes and Their Comparison to Classic, Wire-Based Platinum Microelectrodes in Selected Inorganic Electrolytes.

Szklarz Z, Kolczyk-Siedlecka K, Vereshchagina E, Herbjornrod A, Wittendorp P, Jain S Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(6).

PMID: 38541506 PMC: 10971937. DOI: 10.3390/ma17061352.

biocompatibility evaluation of functional electrically stimulating microelectrodes on primary glia.

Tsui C, Mirkiani S, Roszko D, Churchward M, Mushahwar V, Todd K Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1351087.

PMID: 38314352 PMC: 10834782. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1351087.

Fabrication and Characterization of a Flexible Thin-Film-Based Array of Microelectrodes for Corneal Electrical Stimulation.

Hernandez-Sebastian N, Carpio-Verdin V, Ambriz-Vargas F, Morales-Morales F, Benitez-Lara A, Buenrostro-Jauregui M Micromachines (Basel). 2023; 14(11).

PMID: 38004856 PMC: 10673352. DOI: 10.3390/mi14111999.

Retinal Prostheses: Engineering and Clinical Perspectives for Vision Restoration.

Wu K, Mina M, Sahyoun J, Kalevar A, Tran S Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(13).

PMID: 37447632 PMC: 10347280. DOI: 10.3390/s23135782.

Recent Advances in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design Parameters.

Ertas Y, Ozpolat D, Karasu S, Ashammakhi N Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(7).

PMID: 35888898 PMC: 9323156. DOI: 10.3390/mi13071081.

References

Huang C, Shepherd R, Carter P, Seligman P, Tabor B . Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: direct current measurement in vivo. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999; 46(4):461-70. DOI: 10.1109/10.752943. View

Nadig M . Development of a silicon retinal implant: cortical evoked potentials following focal stimulation of the rabbit retina with light and electricity. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110(9):1545-53. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00027-9. View

Tykocinski M, Duan Y, Tabor B, Cowan R . Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes. Hear Res. 2001; 159(1-2):53-68. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00320-3. View

Humayun M . Intraocular retinal prosthesis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 99:271-300. PMC: 1359018. View

Rivolta C, Sharon D, Deangelis M, Dryja T . Retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases: numerous diseases, genes, and inheritance patterns. Hum Mol Genet. 2002; 11(10):1219-27. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/11.10.1219. View

Kim S, Sadda S, Humayun M, de Juan Jr E, Melia B, Green W . Morphometric analysis of the macula in eyes with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2002; 22(4):464-70. DOI: 10.1097/00006982-200208000-00011. View

Humayun M, Weiland J, Fujii G, Greenberg R, Williamson R, Little J . Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res. 2003; 43(24):2573-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00457-7. View

Rizzo 3rd J, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D . Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(12):5355-61. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0819. View

Husain D, Loewenstein J . Surgical approaches to retinal prosthesis implantation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2004; 44(1):105-11. DOI: 10.1097/00004397-200404410-00012. View

10.

Sakaguchi H, Fujikado T, Fang X, Kanda H, Osanai M, Nakauchi K . Transretinal electrical stimulation with a suprachoroidal multichannel electrode in rabbit eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2004; 48(3):256-61. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-004-0055-1. View

11.

Mahadevappa M, Weiland J, Yanai D, Fine I, Greenberg R, Humayun M . Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005; 13(2):201-6. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848687. View

12.

Franks W, Schenker I, Schmutz P, Hierlemann A . Impedance characterization and modeling of electrodes for biomedical applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005; 52(7):1295-302. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2005.847523. View

13.

Rodger D, Tai Y . Microelectronic packaging for retinal prostheses. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2005; 24(5):52-7. DOI: 10.1109/memb.2005.1511500. View

14.

Jones B, Watt C, Marc R . Retinal remodelling. Clin Exp Optom. 2005; 88(5):282-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2005.tb06712.x. View

15.

Cogan S, Troyk P, Ehrlich J, Plante T, Detlefsen D . Potential-biased, asymmetric waveforms for charge-injection with activated iridium oxide (AIROF) neural stimulation electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006; 53(2):327-32. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2005.862572. View

16.

Hartong D, Berson E, Dryja T . Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet. 2006; 368(9549):1795-809. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69740-7. View

17.

Winter J, Cogan S, Rizzo 3rd J . Retinal prostheses: current challenges and future outlook. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2007; 18(8):1031-55. DOI: 10.1163/156856207781494403. View

18.

de Balthasar C, Patel S, Roy A, Freda R, Greenwald S, Horsager A . Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(6):2303-14. PMC: 2517253. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0696. View

19.

Metallo C, White R, Trimmer B . Flexible parylene-based microelectrode arrays for high resolution EMG recordings in freely moving small animals. J Neurosci Methods. 2010; 195(2):176-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.12.005. View

20.

Behrend M, Ahuja A, Humayun M, Chow R, Weiland J . Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011; 19(4):436-42. PMC: 3356684. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2140132. View