» Articles » PMID: 31367575

Comparison of Tooth Movement and Biological Response in Corticotomy and Micro-osteoperforation in Rabbits

Overview
Journal Korean J Orthod
Date 2019 Aug 2
PMID 31367575
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of tooth movement and histologic changes with different corticotomy designs and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits.

Methods: The sample consisted of 24 rabbits divided into three experimental groups (triangular corticotomy [TC] and indentation corticotomy [IC] with flap, and flapless micro-osteoperforations [MP]) and a control. A traction force of 100 cN was applied by connecting the first premolars to the incisors. The amount of tooth movement was measured. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in tooth movement between the groups. Micro-computed tomography, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) analysis were performed. Analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in TRAP-positive osteoclast count between the groups.

Results: The amount of tooth movement increased by 46.5% and 32.0% in the IC and MP groups, respectively, while the bone fraction analysis showed 69.7% and 8.5% less mineralization compared to the control. There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts.

Conclusions: The micro-osteoperforation group showed no significant differences in the amount of tooth movement compared to the corticotomy groups, nor in the TRAP-positive osteoclast count compared to both corticotomy groups and control.

Citing Articles

The effect of micro-osteoperforation on root resorption, pulp vitality, and biological changes of teeth subjected to orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review study.

Mosayebi N, Khademi A, Bagherieh S, Abedi N, Kargarfard M, Tajmiri G Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023; 20:52.

PMID: 37304419 PMC: 10247875.


The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in animal model: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eini E, Moradinejhad M, Chaharmahali R, Rahim F J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022; 12(6):873-878.

PMID: 36212615 PMC: 9535315. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.09.015.


Micro-Osteoperforations Induce TNF-α Expression and Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement via TNF-α-Responsive Stromal Cells.

Kinjo R, Kitaura H, Ogawa S, Ohori F, Noguchi T, Marahleh A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(6).

PMID: 35328385 PMC: 8955966. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23062968.


Comparison of the effects of horizontal and vertical micro-osteoperforations on the biological response and tooth movement in rabbits.

Kim S, Kook Y, Lim H, Park P, Lee W, Park J Korean J Orthod. 2021; 51(5):304-312.

PMID: 34556584 PMC: 8461390. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.5.304.


Comparison of tooth movement and biological response resulting from different force magnitudes combined with osteoperforation in rabbits.

Huang C, Lu H, Yu Y, Ding X, Zhang Z, Zhang J J Appl Oral Sci. 2021; 29:e20200734.

PMID: 33825762 PMC: 9648947. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0734.


References
1.
Chung K, Oh M, Ko S . Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Orthod. 2001; 35(5):331-9. View

2.
Iseri H, Kisnisci R, Bzizi N, Tuz H . Rapid canine retraction and orthodontic treatment with dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127(5):533-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.022. View

3.
Castaneda S, Largo R, Calvo E, Rodriguez-Salvanes F, Marcos M, Diaz-Curiel M . Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits. Skeletal Radiol. 2005; 35(1):34-41. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-005-0022-z. View

4.
Kim T, Handa A, Iida J, Yoshida S . RANKL expression in rat periodontal ligament subjected to a continuous orthodontic force. Arch Oral Biol. 2006; 52(3):244-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.10.003. View

5.
Nagaraj K, Upadhyay M, Yadav S . Titanium screw anchorage for protraction of mandibular second molars into first molar extraction sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134(4):583-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.055. View