Regaining Confidence After Stroke (RCAS): a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)

Overview

Journal Pilot Feasibility Stud

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2019 Aug 2

PMID 31367463

Citations 4

Authors

Jane C Horne

Kate E Hooban

Nadina B Lincoln

Pip A Logan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Regaining Confidence after Stroke (RCAS) course was designed to facilitate adjustment for people with stroke discharged from rehabilitation. The aim of the trial was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomised trial to compare a RCAS course with usual care. The rates feasibility of screening and recruitment, rates of consent and retention, acceptability of outcome measures and the acceptability and fidelity of the intervention were evaluated.

Methods: Participants with stroke were recruited from hospital databases and community services and randomly assigned to the Regaining Confidence after Stroke (RCAS) course or usual care. The course comprised 11 weekly 2-h sessions with six-eight participants, delivered by two rehabilitation assistants. Carers were invited to attend three of the sessions. Sessions were video recorded. A six-item checklist was developed from the manual content. Each item was rated as met, partially met or not met. Fidelity was assumed if > 75% of the criteria were met. Outcomes were assessed three and six months after randomisation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using open-ended questions to assess the acceptability of the intervention.

Results: Of 47 participants (mean age 66.9 years [SD 14.9]; 26 men), 22 were randomly allocated to the intervention and 25 to usual care. Participants attended a mean of 8.2 [SD 2.6] out of 11 sessions. Fidelity outcomes suggested that the content corresponded to the manual but further training of the therapist was needed. Interview findings indicated the intervention was acceptable and considered beneficial. At three months, 35 (78%) participants returned questionnaires and 30 (67%) at six months, but only 38(42%) were fully completed.

Conclusion: The results support the feasibility of conducting a randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a RCAS course compared to usual care.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN 36330958.

Citing Articles

Consolidated guidance for behavioral intervention pilot and feasibility studies.

Pfledderer C, VON Klinggraeff L, Burkart S, da Silva Bandeira A, Lubans D, Jago R Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024; 10(1):57.

PMID: 38582840 PMC: 10998328. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01485-5.

Expert Perspectives on Pilot and Feasibility Studies: A Delphi Study and Consolidation of Considerations for Behavioral Interventions.

Pfledderer C, VON Klinggraeff L, Burkart S, da Silva Bandeira A, Lubans D, Jago R Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38168263 PMC: 10760234. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3370077/v1.

An Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy App for People with Dementia and Carers: Results from a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Rai H, Schneider J, Orrell M Clin Interv Aging. 2022; 16:2079-2094.

PMID: 35221680 PMC: 8866989. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S323994.

An Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy App for People With Dementia and Their Carers: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rai H, Schneider J, Orrell M JMIR Res Protoc. 2021; 10(4):e24628.

PMID: 33830058 PMC: 8075044. DOI: 10.2196/24628.

References

Parker C, Dewey M . Assessing research outcomes by postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up. TOTAL Study Group. Trial of Occupational Therapy and Leisure. Int J Epidemiol. 2000; 29(6):1065-9. DOI: 10.1093/ije/29.6.1065. View

Dumas J, Lynch A, Laughlin J, Phillips Smith E, Prinz R . Promoting intervention fidelity. Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20(1 Suppl):38-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00272-5. View

Bandura A . Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52:1-26. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1. View

Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R . Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002; 324(7347):1183. PMC: 111107. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183. View

Whyte E, Mulsant B . Post stroke depression: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and biological treatment. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 52(3):253-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01424-5. View

MAHONEY F, BARTHEL D . FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. View

Gage H, Storey L . Rehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of available evidence. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18(5):463-82. DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr764oa. View

McDonald A, Knight R, Campbell M, Entwistle V, Grant A, Cook J . What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006; 7:9. PMC: 1475627. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9. View

Watkins C, Auton M, Deans C, Dickinson H, Jack C, Lightbody C . Motivational interviewing early after acute stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2007; 38(3):1004-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000258114.28006.d7. View

10.

Campbell M, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald A, Knight R . Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11(48):iii, ix-105. DOI: 10.3310/hta11480. View

11.

McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Rudd A . Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011; 42(5):1398-403. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.598839. View

12.

Lincoln N, Yuill F, Holmes J, Drummond A, Constantinescu C, Armstrong S . Evaluation of an adjustment group for people with multiple sclerosis and low mood: a randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2011; 17(10):1250-7. DOI: 10.1177/1352458511408753. View

13.

Pollock A, St George B, Fenton M, Firkins L . Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(3):209. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70029-7. View

14.

Billingham S, Whitehead A, Julious S . An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:104. PMC: 3765378. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104. View

15.

Ahn S, Basu R, Smith M, Jiang L, Lorig K, Whitelaw N . The impact of chronic disease self-management programs: healthcare savings through a community-based intervention. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:1141. PMC: 3878965. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1141. View

16.

Logan P, Armstrong S, Avery T, Barer D, Barton G, Darby J . Rehabilitation aimed at improving outdoor mobility for people after stroke: a multicentre randomised controlled study (the Getting out of the House Study). Health Technol Assess. 2014; 18(29):vii-viii, 1-113. PMC: 4781056. DOI: 10.3310/hta18290. View

17.

Horne J, Lincoln N, Preston J, Logan P . What does confidence mean to people who have had a stroke? A qualitative interview study. Clin Rehabil. 2014; 28(11):1125-35. DOI: 10.1177/0269215514534086. View

18.

Alexandrowicz R, Friedrich F, Jahn R, Soulier N . Using Rasch-models to compare the 30-, 20-, and 12-items version of the general health questionnaire taking four recoding schemes into account. Neuropsychiatr. 2015; 29(4):179-91. DOI: 10.1007/s40211-015-0160-z. View

19.

Visser M, Heijenbrok-Kal M, Vant Spijker A, Lannoo E, Busschbach J, Ribbers G . Problem-Solving Therapy During Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Improves Coping and Health-Related Quality of Life: Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2015; 47(1):135-42. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010961. View

20.

Eldridge S, Lancaster G, Campbell M, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman C . Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0150205. PMC: 4792418. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. View