» Articles » PMID: 31360848

High-risk, Expression-Based Prognostic Long Noncoding RNA Signature in Neuroblastoma

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jul 31
PMID 31360848
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current clinical risk factors stratify patients with neuroblastoma (NB) for appropriate treatments, yet patients with similar clinical behaviors evoke variable responses. MYCN amplification is one of the established drivers of NB and, when combined with high-risk displays, worsens outcomes. Growing high-throughput transcriptomics studies suggest long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) dysregulation in cancers, including NB. However, expression-based lncRNA signatures are altered by MYCN amplification, which is associated with high-risk, and patient prognosis remains limited.

Methods: We investigated RNA-seq-based expression profiles of lncRNAs in MYCN status and risk status in a discovery cohort (n = 493) and validated them in three independent cohorts. In the discovery cohort, a prognostic association of lncRNAs was determined by univariate Cox regression and integrated into a signature using the risk score method. A novel risk score threshold selection criterion was developed to stratify patients into risk groups. Outcomes by risk group and clinical subgroup were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression. The performance of lncRNA signatures was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: In the discovery cohort, 16 lncRNAs that were differentially expressed (fold change ≥ 2 and adjusted ≤ 0.01) integrated into a prognostic signature. A high risk score group of lncRNA signature had poor event-free survival (EFS; < 1E-16). Notably, lncRNA signature was independent of other clinical risk factors when predicting EFS (hazard ratio = 3.21, = 5.95E-07). The findings were confirmed in independent cohorts ( = 2.86E-02, = 6.18E-03, = 9.39E-03, respectively). Finally, the lncRNA signature had higher accuracy for EFS prediction (area under the curve = 0.788, 95% confidence interval = 0.746 to 0.831).

Conclusions: Here, we report the first (to our knowledge) RNA-seq 16-lncRNA prognostic signature for NB that may contribute to precise clinical stratification and EFS prediction.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of lncRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer through Bioinformatics and Machine Learning.

Soleimani S, Pouresmaeili F, Salahshoori Far I Iran J Biotechnol. 2024; 22(3):e3853.

PMID: 39737204 PMC: 11682528. DOI: 10.30498/ijb.2024.432171.3853.


Development and validation of a 21-gene prognostic signature in neuroblastoma.

Gupta M, Kannappan S, Jain M, Douglass D, Shah R, Bose P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12526.

PMID: 37532697 PMC: 10397261. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37714-9.


LINC00839 promotes colorectal cancer progression by recruiting RUVBL1/Tip60 complexes to activate NRF1.

Liu X, Chen J, Zhang S, Liu X, Long X, Lan J EMBO Rep. 2022; 23(9):e54128.

PMID: 35876654 PMC: 9442307. DOI: 10.15252/embr.202154128.


Comprehensive Analyses of Mutation-Derived Long-Chain Noncoding RNA Signatures of Genome Instability in Kidney Renal Papillary Cell Carcinoma.

Li J, Wei S, Zhang Y, Lu S, Zhang X, Wang Q Front Genet. 2022; 13:874673.

PMID: 35547247 PMC: 9082950. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.874673.


Deep analysis of neuroblastoma core regulatory circuitries using online databases and integrated bioinformatics shows their pan-cancer roles as prognostic predictors.

Jahangiri L, Pucci P, Ishola T, Pereira J, Cavanagh M, Turner S Discov Oncol. 2022; 12(1):56.

PMID: 35201514 PMC: 8777518. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-021-00452-3.


References
1.
Maris J, Matthay K . Molecular biology of neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(7):2264-79. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2264. View

2.
Bussemakers M, van Bokhoven A, Verhaegh G, Smit F, Karthaus H, Schalken J . DD3: a new prostate-specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1999; 59(23):5975-9. View

3.
Brodeur G . Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3(3):203-16. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1014. View

4.
Hessels D, Klein Gunnewiek J, van Oort I, Karthaus H, van Leenders G, van Balken B . DD3(PCA3)-based molecular urine analysis for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2003; 44(1):8-15; discussion 15-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00201-x. View

5.
London W, Castleberry R, Matthay K, Look A, Seeger R, Shimada H . Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(27):6459-65. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.571. View