» Articles » PMID: 31359913

Performance of A Convolutional Neural Network in Screening Liquid Based Cervical Cytology Smears

Overview
Journal J Cytol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2019 Jul 31
PMID 31359913
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women. The liquid based cervical cytology (LBCC) is a useful tool of choice for screening cervical cancer.

Aims: To train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify abnormal foci from LBCC smears.

Settings And Design: We have chosen retrospective study design from archived smears of patients undergoing screening from cervical cancer by LBCC smears.

Materials And Methods: 2816 images, each of 256 × 256 pixels, were prepared from microphotographs of these LBCC smears, which included 816 "abnormal" foci (low grade or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and 2000 'normal' foci (benign epithelial cells and reactive changes). The images were split into three sets, Training, Testing, and Evaluation. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed with the python programming language. The CNN was trained with the Training dataset; performance was assayed concurrently with the Testing dataset. Two CNN models were developed, after 20 and 10 epochs of training, respectively. The models were then run on the Evaluation dataset.

Statistical Analysis Used: A contingency table was prepared from the original image labels and the labels predicted by the CNN.

Results: Combined assessment of both models yielded a sensitivity of 95.63% in detecting abnormal foci, with 79.85% specificity. The negative predictive value was high (99.19%), suggesting potential utility in screening. False positives due to overlapping cells, neutrophils, and debris was the principal difficulty met during evaluation.

Conclusions: The CNN shows promise as a screening tool; however, for its use in confirmatory diagnosis, further training with a more diverse dataset will be required.

Citing Articles

Performance of artificial intelligence for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu L, Liu J, Su Q, Chu Y, Xia H, Xu R EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 80():102992.

PMID: 39834510 PMC: 11743870. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102992.


A lightweight xAI approach to cervical cancer classification.

Civit-Masot J, Luna-Perejon F, Munoz-Saavedra L, Dominguez-Morales M, Civit A Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 62(8):2281-2304.

PMID: 38507122 PMC: 11289177. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03063-6.


Revolutionizing Women's Health: A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Gynecology.

Brandao M, Mendes F, Martins M, Cardoso P, Macedo G, Mascarenhas T J Clin Med. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38398374 PMC: 10889757. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041061.


AI-assisted system improves the work efficiency of cytologists via excluding cytology-negative slides and accelerating the slide interpretation.

Du H, Dai W, Zhou Q, Li C, Cheng Li S, Wang C Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1290112.

PMID: 38074680 PMC: 10701732. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1290112.


Artificial Intelligence-driven Digital Cytology-based Cervical Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe to Adopt This Disruptive Technology in Resource-constrained Settings? A Literature Review.

Gupta R, Kumar N, Bansal S, Singh S, Sood N, Gupta S J Digit Imaging. 2023; 36(4):1643-1652.

PMID: 37029285 PMC: 10406989. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-023-00821-0.


References
1.
Nanda K, McCrory D, Myers E, Bastian L, Hasselblad V, Hickey J . Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132(10):810-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00009. View

2.
Monsonego J, Bergeron C, Dachez R, Liaras J, Saurel J, Zerat L . Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84(3):360-6. PMC: 2363733. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1588. View

3.
Bernstein S, Sanchez-Ramos L, Ndubisi B . Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185(2):308-17. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.116736. View

4.
Rodenacker K, Bengtsson E . A feature set for cytometry on digitized microscopic images. Anal Cell Pathol. 2003; 25(1):1-36. PMC: 4618906. DOI: 10.1155/2003/548678. View

5.
Abulafia O, Pezzullo J, Sherer D . Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 90(1):137-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00176-8. View