» Articles » PMID: 31357932

Preoperative Moderate Thrombocytopenia is Not Associated with Increased Blood Loss for Low-risk Cesarean Section: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Jul 31
PMID 31357932
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The occurrence of thrombocytopenia is as high as 7-12% in pregnancy, yet minimum platelet count safe for cesarean section remains unknown.

Methods: In this retrospective noninferior cohort study, we consecutively included patients undergoing cesarean section for a period of 6 years in a tertiary hospital and excluded patients at very high risk for excessive hemorrhage. The included patients with preoperative platelet count of 50-100 × 10/L were defined as the thrombocytopenic group. The control group were eligible patients with preoperative platelet count>150 × 10/L, matched to the thrombocytopenic group by age and operation timing in a 1:2 ratio. Mixed effect model was used to analyze the effect of thrombocytopenia based on a noninferiority assumption. The predefined noninferiority delta of bleeding was 50 mL.

Results: There was no significant difference of the calculated blood loss between the thrombocytopenic and the control group (mean difference = 8.94, 95% CI - 28.34 mL to 46.09 mL). No statistical difference was observed in the requirement for blood transfusion, visually estimated blood loss, or the incidence of adverse events between groups. Although there were more patients admitted to intensive care unit (odds ratio = 12, 95% CI 2.69-53.62, p = 0.001) in the thrombocytopenic group, most of them required critical care for reasons other than hemorrhage. The thrombocytopenic group had longer length of hospital stay (mean difference = 0.40 days, 95% CI 0.09-0.71, p = 0.011), but the difference was considered as clinically insignificant.

Conclusions: Preoperative moderate thrombocytopenia is not associated with increased blood loss, blood transfusion, or occurrence of adverse events in patients undergoing cesarean section in absence of additional bleeding risk.

Citing Articles

Hemostatic biomarkers associated with postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

de Moreuil C, Mehic D, Nopp S, Kraemmer D, Gebhart J, Schramm T Blood Adv. 2023; 7(19):5954-5967.

PMID: 37307172 PMC: 10562765. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010143.


Prediction and Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Section and Analysis of Risk Factors of Hypothermia during Anesthesia Recovery.

Ren W, Li D, Wang J, Zhang J, Fu Z, Yao Y Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022:8661324.

PMID: 35465016 PMC: 9020991. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8661324.


Gestational Thrombocytopenia: A Review on Recent Updates.

Habas Sr E, Rayani A, Alfitori G, Eldin Ahmed G, Elzouki A Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e23204.

PMID: 35444886 PMC: 9010930. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23204.


Platelet count and indices as postpartum hemorrhage risk factors: a retrospective cohort study.

van Dijk W, Nijdam J, Haitjema S, de Groot M, Huisman A, Punt M J Thromb Haemost. 2021; 19(11):2873-2883.

PMID: 34339085 PMC: 9292153. DOI: 10.1111/jth.15481.

References
1.
Gill K, Kelton J . Management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy. Semin Hematol. 2000; 37(3):275-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0037-1963(00)90106-9. View

2.
Kelton J . Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura complicating pregnancy. Blood Rev. 2002; 16(1):43-6. DOI: 10.1054/blre.2001.0181. View

3.
Lee L . Idiopathic thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2002; 31(3):335-9. View

4.
Webert K, Mittal R, Sigouin C, Heddle N, Kelton J . A retrospective 11-year analysis of obstetric patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood. 2003; 102(13):4306-11. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3317. View

5.
Won Y, Moon W, Yun Y, Oh H, Choi J, Lee Y . Clinical aspects of pregnancy and delivery in patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Korean J Intern Med. 2005; 20(2):129-34. PMC: 3891381. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2005.20.2.129. View