» Articles » PMID: 31355695

Differential Focus on Probability and Losses Between Young and Older Adults in Risky Decision-making

Overview
Date 2019 Jul 30
PMID 31355695
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examined young and older adults' use of descriptive information about risk (i.e., probability and expected value) in financial decision-making. In Experiment 1, participants chose between lotteries in pairs of bets that offered either two risky gains or one risky gain and one sure gain. Whereas they showed a strong and indiscriminate preference for high-probability gambles in risky-risky pairs, they selected sure options at high rates and risky options at low rates in risky-sure pairs, with slightly stronger effects in older relative to young adults due to age differences in ability. Experiment 2 involved the same task but in terms of losses. Participants, especially older adults, preferred low-probability gambles not accounted for by age differences in ability. Results suggest minimal consideration of expected value and a strong focus on probabilities in decision-making. They also suggest that cognitive ability and chronic goals differentially influence age effects depending on risk context.

Citing Articles

Age-Related Differences in Framing Selective Memory in Terms of Gains and Losses.

Murphy D, Castel A, Knowlton B Exp Aging Res. 2023; 50(4):506-521.

PMID: 37409470 PMC: 10770296. DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2023.2233366.


Age Influences Loss Aversion Through Effects on Posterior Cingulate Cortical Thickness.

Guttman Z, Ghahremani D, Pochon J, Dean A, London E Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:673106.

PMID: 34321994 PMC: 8311492. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.673106.


The Appraisal Approach to Aging and Emotion: An Integrative Theoretical Framework.

Young N, Minton A, Mikels J Dev Rev. 2021; 59.

PMID: 33737760 PMC: 7963263. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2021.100947.


Losing Money and Motivation: Effects of Loss Incentives on Motivation and Metacognition in Younger and Older Adults.

Jang H, Lin Z, Lustig C Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1489.

PMID: 32765347 PMC: 7381126. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01489.

References
1.
Weller J, Levin I, Bechara A . Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009; 32(2):141-50. DOI: 10.1080/13803390902881926. View

2.
Mata R, Josef A, Samanez-Larkin G, Hertwig R . Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011; 1235:18-29. PMC: 3332530. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06200.x. View

3.
Zwahr M, Park D, Shifren K . Judgments about estrogen replacement therapy: the role of age, cognitive abilities, and beliefs. Psychol Aging. 1999; 14(2):179-91. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.14.2.179. View

4.
Tymula A, Rosenberg Belmaker L, Ruderman L, Glimcher P, Levy I . Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(42):17143-8. PMC: 3801020. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309909110. View

5.
Boyle P, Yu L, Buchman A, Bennett D . Risk Aversion is Associated with Decision Making among Community-Based Older Persons. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:205. PMC: 3385154. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00205. View