» Articles » PMID: 31354460

Efficacy and Brain Imaging Correlates of an Immersive Motor Imagery BCI-Driven VR System for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation: A Clinical Case Report

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Jul 30
PMID 31354460
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To maximize brain plasticity after stroke, a plethora of rehabilitation strategies have been explored. These include the use of intensive motor training, motor-imagery (MI), and action-observation (AO). Growing evidence of the positive impact of virtual reality (VR) techniques on recovery following stroke has been shown. However, most VR tools are designed to exploit active movement, and hence patients with low level of motor control cannot fully benefit from them. Consequently, the idea of directly training the central nervous system has been promoted by utilizing MI with electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). To date, detailed information on which VR strategies lead to successful functional recovery is still largely missing and very little is known on how to optimally integrate EEG-based BCIs and VR paradigms for stroke rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of an EEG-based BCI-VR system using a MI paradigm for post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation on functional assessments, and related changes in MI ability and brain imaging. To achieve this, a 60 years old male chronic stroke patient was recruited. The patient underwent a 3-week intervention in a clinical environment, resulting in 10 BCI-VR training sessions. The patient was assessed before and after intervention, as well as on a one-month follow-up, in terms of clinical scales and brain imaging using functional MRI (fMRI). Consistent with prior research, we found important improvements in upper extremity scores (Fugl-Meyer) and identified increases in brain activation measured by fMRI that suggest neuroplastic changes in brain motor networks. This study expands on the current body of evidence, as more data are needed on the effect of this type of interventions not only on functional improvement but also on the effect of the intervention on plasticity through brain imaging.

Citing Articles

EEG-based sensorimotor neurofeedback for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults: A scoping review.

Cioffi E, Hutber A, Molloy R, Murden S, Yurkewich A, Kirton A Clin Neurophysiol. 2024; 167:143-166.

PMID: 39321571 PMC: 11845253. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.08.009.


Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: State of the Art and Trends.

Edelman B, Zhang S, Schalk G, Brunner P, Muller-Putz G, Guan C IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2024; 18:26-49.

PMID: 39186407 PMC: 11861396. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2024.3449790.


The impact of virtual reality and distractors on attentional processes: insights from EEG.

Pappalettera C, Miraglia F, Cacciotti A, Nucci L, Tufo G, Rossini P Pflugers Arch. 2024; 476(11):1727-1742.

PMID: 39158612 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-024-03008-w.


Immersive VR for upper-extremity rehabilitation in patients with neurological disorders: a scoping review.

Ceradini M, Losanno E, Micera S, Bandini A, Orlandi S J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):75.

PMID: 38734690 PMC: 11088157. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01367-0.


Effects of motor imagery-based neurofeedback training after bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke upper limb motor function: an exploratory crossover clinical trial.

Sanchez Cuesta F, Gonzalez-Zamorano Y, Moreno-Verdu M, Vourvopoulos A, Serrano I, Del Castillo-Sobrino M J Rehabil Med. 2024; 56:jrm18253.

PMID: 38450442 PMC: 10938141. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.18253.


References
1.
Duncan P, Wallace D, Lai S, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster L . The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999; 30(10):2131-40. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131. View

2.
Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva F . Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110(11):1842-57. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8. View

3.
Klem G, Luders H, JASPER H, Elger C . The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999; 52:3-6. View

4.
Jeannerod M, Frak V . Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999; 9(6):735-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00038-0. View

5.
McFarland D, Miner L, Vaughan T, Wolpaw J . Mu and beta rhythm topographies during motor imagery and actual movements. Brain Topogr. 2000; 12(3):177-86. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023437823106. View