» Articles » PMID: 31354404

Identifying Cortical Substrates Underlying the Phenomenology of Stereopsis and Realness: A Pilot FMRI Study

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2019 Jul 30
PMID 31354404
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Viewing a real scene or a stereoscopic image (e.g., 3D movies) with both eyes yields a vivid subjective impression of object solidity, tangibility, immersive negative space and sense of realness; something that is not experienced when viewing single pictures of 3D scenes normally with both eyes. This phenomenology, sometimes referred to as stereopsis, is conventionally ascribed to the derivation of depth from the differences in the two eye's images (binocular disparity). Here we report on a pilot study designed to explore if dissociable neural activity associated with the phenomenology of realness can be localized in the cortex. In order to dissociate subjective impression from disparity processing, we capitalized on the finding that the impression of realness associated with stereoscopic viewing can also be generated when viewing a single picture of a 3D scene with one eye through an aperture. Under a blocked fMRI design, subjects viewed intact and scrambled images of natural 3-D objects, and scenes under three viewing conditions: (1) single pictures viewed normally with both eyes (binocular); (2) single pictures viewed with one eye through an aperture (monocular-aperture); and (3) stereoscopic anaglyph images of the same scenes viewed with both eyes (binocular stereopsis). Fixed-effects GLM contrasts aimed at isolating the phenomenology of stereopsis demonstrated a selective recruitment of similar posterior parietal regions for both monocular and binocular stereopsis conditions. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that the cortical processing underlying the subjective impression of realness may be dissociable and distinct from the derivation of depth from disparity.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Effect of Preoperative Stereopsis on Visual Outcomes in Hyperopic Presbyopes Treated with PresbyOND Laser Blended Vision Micro-Monovision.

Hernandez-Lucena J, Alonso-Aliste F, Amian-Cordero J, Sanchez-Gonzalez J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37835042 PMC: 10573515. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196399.


From pictures to reality: modelling the phenomenology and psychophysics of 3D perception.

Vishwanath D Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 378(1869):20210454.

PMID: 36511412 PMC: 9745870. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0454.


[Abnormal spontaneous brain functional activity in adult patients with amblyopia: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study].

Chen X, Liao M, Jiang P, Liu L, Gong Q Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2022; 39(4):759-766.

PMID: 36008340 PMC: 10957354. DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.202203072.

References
1.
Goncalves N, Ban H, Sanchez-Panchuelo R, Francis S, Schluppeck D, Welchman A . 7 tesla FMRI reveals systematic functional organization for binocular disparity in dorsal visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(7):3056-72. PMC: 4331627. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3047-14.2015. View

2.
Van Dromme I, Premereur E, Verhoef B, Vanduffel W, Janssen P . Posterior Parietal Cortex Drives Inferotemporal Activations During Three-Dimensional Object Vision. PLoS Biol. 2016; 14(4):e1002445. PMC: 4833303. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002445. View

3.
Konen C, Mruczek R, Montoya J, Kastner S . Functional organization of human posterior parietal cortex: grasping- and reaching-related activations relative to topographically organized cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2013; 109(12):2897-908. PMC: 3680816. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00657.2012. View

4.
Grefkes C, Fink G . The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. J Anat. 2005; 207(1):3-17. PMC: 1571496. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00426.x. View

5.
Glennerster A, Rogers B, Bradshaw M . Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task. Vision Res. 1996; 36(21):3441-56. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00090-9. View