» Articles » PMID: 31354203

Outflow Facility in Tube Shunt Fenestration

Overview
Date 2019 Jul 30
PMID 31354203
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Determination of the effect of varying fenestration technique, and simulated patch graft on outflow facility for Baerveldt tube.

Materials And Methods: Silicone tubing similar to Baerveldt implant (AMO, Santa Ana, CA) with different fenestrations techniques was connected to a digital manometer in a closed system with a fluid-filled syringe on a stand to adjust pressure. The venting slits included: (A) 4 piercings with 7-0 TG140-8 needle; (B) a 2-mm slit with a 15° blade; (C) 4 piercings with a 15° blade; (D) 9-0 Nylon on CS140-6 needle with suture stenting the fenestration.

Results: For pressures of 10, 20, 30, 40 mm Hg in groups A to D, the average outflow facility (mL/min/mm Hg) were group A: 0.11, 0.20, 0.28, 0.40; group B: 0.30, 0.69, 0.98, 0.93; group C: 0.73, 0.80, 0.81, 0.88; group D: 0.58, 0.65, 0.80, 0.87. For external compression with 10 gram weights at pressures of 10, 20, 30, 40 mm Hg, outflow were group A: 0.0, 0.18, 0.20, 0.53; group B: 0.75, 0.70, 0.97, 1.21. Group C: 0.18, 0.03, 0.57, 0.04. Group D: 0.73, 0.90, 1.13, 0.91.

Conclusion: Effectivity of venting slits in maintaining adequate IOP in the early postoperative period for non-valved glaucoma implant is variable, multifactorial and largely intraocular pressure (IOP) dependent.

Clinical Significance: This study explores methods of producing fenestration and the effects on outflow at different pressures in an attempt to determine which fenestration technique has more reproducible results that can be made applicable in clinical practice. This is also the first study to evaluate the effect of external pressures similar to scleral patch graft on the tube fenestrations.

How To Cite This Article: Olayanju J, Borras T, Qaqish B, Fleischman D. Outflow Facility in Tube Shunt Fenestration. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018;12(3):113-118.

Citing Articles

How Many Fenestrations Should I Make When Placing a Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant? A Laboratory Study.

Yang M, Yang C, Lin K J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2023; 18(2):157-163.

PMID: 37181610 PMC: 10172796. DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13181.

References
1.
Kansal S, Moster M, Kim D, Schmidt Jr C, Wilson R, Katz L . Effectiveness of nonocclusive ligature and fenestration used in Baerveldt aqueous shunts for early postoperative intraocular pressure control. J Glaucoma. 2002; 11(1):65-70. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200202000-00012. View

2.
Emerick G, Gedde S, Budenz D . Tube fenestrations in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant surgery: 1-year results compared with standard implant surgery. J Glaucoma. 2002; 11(4):340-6. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200208000-00011. View

3.
Rietveld E, van der Veen A . Postoperative pressure regulation in glaucoma shunt surgery: focal tube constriction is not the answer. J Glaucoma. 2004; 13(3):216-20. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200406000-00007. View

4.
Hong C, Arosemena A, Zurakowski D, Ayyala R . Glaucoma drainage devices: a systematic literature review and current controversies. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 50(1):48-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.10.006. View

5.
Joshi A, Parrish 2nd R, Feuer W . 2002 survey of the American Glaucoma Society: practice preferences for glaucoma surgery and antifibrotic use. J Glaucoma. 2005; 14(2):172-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000151684.12033.4d. View