» Articles » PMID: 31350857

Visual Configural Processing in Adults Born at Extremely Low Birth Weight

Overview
Journal Dev Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2019 Jul 28
PMID 31350857
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Being born at extremely low birth weight (ELBW; ≤1,000 g) is associated with enduring visual impairments. We tested for long-term, higher order visual processing problems in the oldest known prospectively followed cohort of ELBW survivors. Configural processing (spacing among features of an object) was examined in 62 adults born at ELBW (M  = 31.9 years) and 82 adults born at normal birth weight (NBW; ≥2,500 g: M  = 32.5 years). Pairs of human faces, monkey faces, or houses were presented in a delayed match-to-sample task, where non-matching stimuli differed only in the spacing of their features. Discrimination accuracy for each stimulus type was compared between birth weight groups, adjusting for neurosensory impairment, visual acuity, binocular fusion ability, IQ, and sex. Both groups were better able to discriminate human faces than monkey faces (p < .001). However, the ELBW group discriminated between human faces (p < .001), between monkey faces (p < .001), and to some degree, between houses (p < .06), more poorly than NBW control participants, suggesting a general deficit in perceptual processing. Human face discrimination was related to performance IQ (PIQ) across groups, but especially among ELBW survivors. Coding (a PIQ subtest) also predicted human face discrimination in ELBW survivors, consistent with previously reported links between visuo-perceptive difficulties and regional slowing of cortical activity in individuals born preterm. Correlations with Coding suggested ELBW survivors may have used a feature-matching approach to processing human faces. Future studies could examine brain-based anatomical and functional evidence for altered face processing, as well as the social and memory consequences of face-processing deficits in ELBW survivors.

Citing Articles

Face Processing in Prematurely Born Individuals-A Systematic Review.

Tang T, Pledts K, Moerkerke M, Van der Donck S, Bollen B, Steyaert J Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766368 PMC: 11675004. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121168.


Visual pathways functioning in healthy pre-term adolescents: Sex but not gestational age effect.

Taddei M, Tinelli F, Faccio F, Riva D, Bulgheroni S Pediatr Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39415036 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03513-9.


Social cognition in individuals born preterm.

Pavlova M, Galli J, Zanetti F, Pagani F, Micheletti S, Rossi A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):14448.

PMID: 34262075 PMC: 8280144. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93709-4.

References
1.
Maurer D, OCraven K, Le Grand R, Mondloch C, Springer M, Lewis T . Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(7):1438-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.016. View

2.
Butcher P, Bouma A, Stremmelaar E, Bos A, Smithson M, van Braeckel K . Visuospatial perception in children born preterm with no major neurological disorders. Neuropsychology. 2012; 26(6):723-34. DOI: 10.1037/a0029298. View

3.
Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Hattersley B, Milner R . Decreased disability rate among 3-year-old survivors weighing 501 to 1000 grams at birth and born to residents of a geographically defined region from 1981 to 1984 compared with 1977 to 1980. J Pediatr. 1989; 114(5):839-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80150-7. View

4.
Rose S, Feldman J, Jankowski J, Van Rossem R . Basic Information Processing Abilities at 11 years Account for Deficits in IQ Associated with Preterm Birth. Intelligence. 2011; 39(4):198-209. PMC: 3106278. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.003. View

5.
OConnor A, Stephenson T, Johnson A, Tobin M, Ratib S, Moseley M . Visual function in low birthweight children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88(9):1149-53. PMC: 1772308. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.035154. View