» Articles » PMID: 31346475

Ear, Tail and Skin Lesions Vary According to Different Production Flows in a Farrow-to-finish Pig Farm

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Jul 27
PMID 31346475
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pig performance and risk of disease are associated with production flow. Given the link between health and welfare, it is likely that animal welfare indicators are also associated with production flow. This study investigated the association between production flow and tail, ear and skin lesions on a farm with a purported 'all-in/all-out' policy. This was an observational study whereby pigs were managed according to routine farm practice. A total of 1,016 pigs born within 1 week from the same batch were followed through the production stages and the presence or absence of welfare indicators was recorded at 4, 7, 9, 12, 16 and 24 weeks of age. Three production flows were retrospectively identified: flow 1 = 'normal' pigs that advanced through the production stages together 'on time', flow 2 = pigs delayed from advancing from the 1 to the 2 nursery stage by 1 week and flow 3 = pigs delayed from advancing through the production stages by > 1 week. A nested case control design was applied by matching pigs by sow parity, number of born alive and birth weight.

Results: The presence of ear lesions was 4.5 less likely in pigs in flow 2 and 2.9 times less likely in pigs in flow 3 ( < 0.001) compared to pigs in flow 1. Pigs in flow 3 were 2.2 more likely to have tail and 1.6 times more likely to have ear lesions (P < 0.001) compared to pigs in flow 2. Pigs in flow 2 were less likely to have tail lesions compared with pigs in flow 1 ( < 0.05). Differences between production flows for the risk of skin lesions varied according to age (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: All production flows were associated with a high risk of lesions which raises concerns for pig welfare. However, risks for ear, tail and skin lesions varied according to each production flow likely due to the specific management practices inherent to each flow. Results from this study could be used to modify existing management practices, thus leading to improvements in animal welfare and possibly performance in intensive pig systems.

Citing Articles

Porcine ear necrosis in nursery piglets is preceded by oral manipulations of the ear.

Malik M, Chiers K, Chantziaras I, Maes D Porcine Health Manag. 2024; 10(1):51.

PMID: 39538360 PMC: 11562591. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-024-00388-4.


Description of patterns of ear and tail lesions during the grower-finisher period in a commercial pig farm.

van Staaveren N, Pessoa J, Boyle L, Calderon Diaz J Porcine Health Manag. 2024; 10(1):23.

PMID: 38937857 PMC: 11210170. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-024-00374-w.


Relationships between pig farm management and facilities and lung lesions' scores and between lung lesions scores and carcass characteristics.

Kuberka Z, Mee J, Walaszek-Kayaoglu A, Klimowicz-Bodys M, Dors A, Rzasa A BMC Vet Res. 2024; 20(1):124.

PMID: 38539145 PMC: 10976837. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-03968-2.


Porcine ear necrosis is associated with social behaviours in weaned piglets.

Boulbria G, Nicolazo T, Teixeira-Costa C, Clouard C, Lebret A, Normand V BMC Vet Res. 2024; 20(1):118.

PMID: 38521914 PMC: 10960443. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-03974-4.


Adapted Original Music as an Environmental Enrichment in an Intensive Pig Production System Reduced Aggression in Weaned Pigs during Regrouping.

Alvarez-Hernandez N, Vallejo-Timaran D, Rodriguez B Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(23).

PMID: 38066950 PMC: 10705521. DOI: 10.3390/ani13233599.


References
1.
Gillooly J, Brown J, WEST G, Savage V, Charnov E . Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science. 2001; 293(5538):2248-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.1061967. View

2.
Simonsen H . Tail biting in pigs. Vet J. 2001; 162(3):196-210. DOI: 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0605. View

3.
Brumm M, Ellis M, Johnston L, Rozeboom D, Zimmerman D . Effect of removal and remixing of lightweight pigs on performance to slaughter weights. J Anim Sci. 2002; 80(5):1166-72. DOI: 10.2527/2002.8051166x. View

4.
Edwards S . Tail biting in pigs: understanding the intractable problem. Vet J. 2005; 171(2):198-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.04.010. View

5.
Heinonen M, Orro T, Kokkonen T, Munsterhjelm C, Peltoniemi O, Valros A . Tail biting induces a strong acute phase response and tail-end inflammation in finishing pigs. Vet J. 2009; 184(3):303-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.02.021. View