» Articles » PMID: 31346397

Ethical Considerations in the Biomedical Research: Analysis of National Biomedical Research Ethics Guidelines in Iran

Overview
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2019 Jul 27
PMID 31346397
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The national guidelines for biomedical research ethics are approved by the "National Committee for Ethics in Biomedical Research" at the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education as the regulatory body for biomedical research in the country. The focus of these guidelines should be on the ethical issues related to different stages of the research process, which would lead to increased research integrity and better supervision of research activities. The present study analyzed the contents of these national guidelines to clarify the ethical considerations connected to the five stages of a research process including 1) proposing, 2) approval, 3) operation, 4) documentation and 5) publishing. The findings showed that the assessed guidelines laid more emphasis on the ethical considerations related to the research operation stage rather than the proposal stage. In other words, activities such as identification of the research problem, formulation of hypotheses and questions, financial evaluation, data analysis and data interpretation did not receive adequate attention in these guidelines. Most of the guidelines presented subject categories such as the rights of participants and supervisory considerations in the "research operation stage", ethical considerations in the "evaluation and approval procedure stage", and editorial responsibilities in the "research review and publication stage". In general, despite noticeable content for guiding researchers for ethical conduction of research the national guidelines are not adequately developed to cover comprehensive and sufficient ethical considerations regarding all the activities of research.

Citing Articles

Insights From the Development of a Dynamic Consent Platform for the Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) Program: Interview and Survey Study.

Xiong E, Bonner C, King A, Bourne Z, Morgan M, Tolosa X JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e57165.

PMID: 39504120 PMC: 11579620. DOI: 10.2196/57165.


Zoledronic acid targets chemo-resistant polyploid giant cancer cells.

Adibi R, Moein S, Gheisari Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):419.

PMID: 36624105 PMC: 9829701. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27090-1.


Systemic Inflammatory Index Is a Novel Predictor of Intubation Requirement and Mortality after SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Muhammad S, Fischer I, Naderi S, Faghih Jouibari M, Abdolreza S, Karimialavijeh E Pathogens. 2021; 10(1).

PMID: 33440649 PMC: 7827801. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10010058.

References
1.
Fanelli D . Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data. PLoS One. 2010; 5(4):e10271. PMC: 2858206. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010271. View

2.
Alahmad G, Al-Jumah M, Dierickx K . Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2012; 13:34. PMC: 3576357. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-34. View

3.
Fierz K, Gennaro S, Dierickx K, van Achterberg T, Morin K, de Geest S . Scientific misconduct: also an issue in nursing science?. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014; 46(4):271-80. DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12082. View

4.
Fanelli D . Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting. Nature. 2013; 494(7436):149. DOI: 10.1038/494149a. View

5.
Munafo M, Nosek B, Bishop D, Button K, Chambers C, Percie du Sert N . A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 1:0021. PMC: 7610724. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021. View