» Articles » PMID: 31342908

Use of Social Robots in Mental Health and Well-Being Research: Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2019 Jul 26
PMID 31342908
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Technology-assisted clinical interventions are increasingly common in the health care field, often with the proposed aim to improve access to and cost-effectiveness of care. Current technology platforms delivering interventions are largely mobile apps and online websites, although efforts have been made to create more personalized and embodied technology experiences. To extend and improve on these platforms, the field of robotics has been increasingly included in conversations of how to deliver technology-assisted, interactive, and responsive mental health and psychological well-being interventions. Socially assistive robots (SARs) are robotic technology platforms with audio, visual, and movement capabilities that are being developed to interact with individuals socially while also assisting them with management of their physical and psychological well-being. However, little is known about the empirical evidence or utility of using SARs in mental health interventions.

Objective: The review synthesizes and describes the nascent empirical literature of SARs in mental health research and identifies strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement in future research and practice.

Methods: Searches in Medline, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore yielded 12 studies included in the final review after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Abstract and full-text reviews were conducted by two authors independently.

Results: This systematic review of the literature found 5 distinct SARs used in research to investigate the potential for this technology to address mental health and psychological well-being outcomes. Research on mental health applications of SARs focuses largely on elderly dementia patients and relies on usability pilot data with methodological limitations.

Conclusions: The current SARs research in mental health use is limited in generalizability, scope, and measurement of psychological outcomes. Opportunities for expansion of research in this area include diversifying populations studied, SARs used, clinical applications, measures used, and settings for those applications.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Impact of Socially Assistive Robots in Rehabilitation Scenarios.

Carnevale A, Raso A, Antonacci C, Mancini L, Corradini A, Ceccaroli A Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001723 PMC: 11851852. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020204.


An android can show the facial expressions of complex emotions.

Diel A, Sato W, Hsu C, Bauerle A, Teufel M, Minato T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2433.

PMID: 39828769 PMC: 11743596. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84224-3.


Multiuser design of an architecture for social robots in education: teachers, students, and researchers perspectives.

Tozadore D, Romero R Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1409671.

PMID: 39737369 PMC: 11683562. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1409671.


Selecting optimal wearables for measuring physiological arousal in robot-delivered mindfulness-based exercises.

Vacaru S, Lau L, Frederiks K, Sterkenburg P, Barakova E Adv Robot. 2024; 38(19-20):1364-1377.

PMID: 39507502 PMC: 11537300. DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2024.2369797.


Robots as Mental Health Coaches: A Study of Emotional Responses to Technology-Assisted Stress Management Tasks Using Physiological Signals.

Kleczek K, Rice A, Alimardani M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(13).

PMID: 39000810 PMC: 11243909. DOI: 10.3390/s24134032.


References
1.
Blanson Henkemans O, Bierman B, Janssen J, Neerincx M, Looije R, van der Bosch H . Using a robot to personalise health education for children with diabetes type 1: a pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 92(2):174-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.012. View

2.
Berrouiguet S, Baca-Garcia E, Brandt S, Walter M, Courtet P . Fundamentals for Future Mobile-Health (mHealth): A Systematic Review of Mobile Phone and Web-Based Text Messaging in Mental Health. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(6):e135. PMC: 4920962. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5066. View

3.
Bemelmans R, Gelderblom G, Jonker P, de Witte L . Effectiveness of Robot Paro in Intramural Psychogeriatric Care: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015; 16(11):946-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.007. View

4.
Moyle W, Bramble M, Jones C, Murfield J . Care staff perceptions of a social robot called Paro and a look-alike Plush Toy: a descriptive qualitative approach. Aging Ment Health. 2016; 22(3):330-335. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1262820. View

5.
Chandrashekar P . Do mental health mobile apps work: evidence and recommendations for designing high-efficacy mental health mobile apps. Mhealth. 2018; 4:6. PMC: 5897664. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.03.02. View