» Articles » PMID: 31333793

The Difference in Prognosis of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Based on Preoperative Serum Tumor Markers

Overview
Journal J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jul 24
PMID 31333793
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Preoperative serum tumor markers have been widely used to predict prognosis in stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, few previous studies addressed the effect of increased preoperative numbers of tumor markers. : Patients with stage II and III CRC who underwent curative resection were included from January 2009 to October 2015. The relationship between serum tumor markers and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. DFS and OS were compared in stage II and III CRC. : The median follow-up was 45 months. In this study, 735 enrolled patients were assessed based on the numbers of increased tumor markers. We found that these increased tumor markers were closely associated with clinical stage, T stage, N stage, tumor location, pathology type, differentiation, lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion (all p values < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of increased tumor markers directly affected the survival of patients with CRC after curative surgery. The 3-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 84.0% and 91.0%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (42.9% and 37.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients with a score of 0 were 75.9% and 77.9%, respectively, which are much higher than those of patients with a score of 4 (31.7% and 23.6%, respectively). Interestingly, our results suggested that stage III CRC patients with a score of 0 had longer DFS and OS times than stage II patients with scores of 3 and 4. Further analysis revealed statistically significant differences in OS (p < 0.05) but not in DFS. : The number of increased tumor markers could significantly predict prognosis in stage II and III CRC. In addition, these increased tumor markers had direct impacts on metastasis as well as the recurrence status and survival time of stage II and III CRC patients.

Citing Articles

The combined evaluation of preoperative serum CEA and postoperative tissue CEA as a prognostic factor in stages 0-IV colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Tong G, Li H, Shen Y, Tan Z, Qian H Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11():1447041.

PMID: 39830382 PMC: 11739305. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1447041.


Development and validation of nomograms based on pre-/post-operative CEA and CA19-9 for survival predicting in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients after radical resection.

Dai X, Li Y, Wang H, Dai Z, Chen Y, Liu Y Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1402847.

PMID: 39464705 PMC: 11502300. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1402847.


Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Overall Survival in Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Resection with Normal Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen.

Dai X, Wang H, Lu Y, Chen Y, Liu Y, Huang S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(23).

PMID: 38067346 PMC: 10705739. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235643.


Diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer with immunoglobulin heavy constant delta blood marker.

Chen Q, Guo Q, Wang D, Zhu S, Wu D, Wang Z J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(14):12977-12992.

PMID: 37466798 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05161-8.


Perineural invasion affects prognosis of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.

Qin L, Heng Y, Deng S, Gu J, Mao F, Xue Y BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):452.

PMID: 37202778 PMC: 10197328. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10936-w.


References
1.
Nilsson O, Johansson C, Glimelius B, Persson B, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Andren-Sandberg A . Sensitivity and specificity of CA242 in gastro-intestinal cancer. A comparison with CEA, CA50 and CA 19-9. Br J Cancer. 1992; 65(2):215-21. PMC: 1977720. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1992.44. View

2.
Yang X, Li Y, Chen C, Peng C, Liu S, Liu Y . Preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 125 level is an independent negative prognostic marker for overall survival in colorectal cancer. Med Oncol. 2010; 28(3):789-95. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9518-z. View

3.
Grunnet M, Sorensen J . Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011; 76(2):138-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.11.012. View

4.
Lin P, Lin J, Lin C, Wang H, Yang S, Jiang J . Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a valuable prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients with normal levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and may help predict lung metastasis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27(10):1333-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1447-1. View

5.
Aggarwal C, Meropol N, Punt C, Iannotti N, Saidman B, Sabbath K . Relationship among circulating tumor cells, CEA and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012; 24(2):420-428. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds336. View