» Articles » PMID: 31331381

How Does Feedback Shared with Interprofessional Health Care Teams Shape Nursing Performance Improvement Systems? A Rapid Realist Review Protocol

Overview
Journal Syst Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Jul 24
PMID 31331381
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nursing care quality varies between hospitals, and even between departments within the same institution. Suboptimal care can have deleterious consequences for patients such as lengthened hospital stay, nosocomial infection, pressure ulcers or death. Experts recommend the implementation of nursing performance improvement systems to assess team performance and monitor patient outcomes and efficiency savings. In practice, these systems are expected to include feedback processes directed towards nursing teams and interprofessional staff in order to facilitate adjustments and improve their performance. Unfortunately, feedback appears somewhat haphazard and, at times, overlooked. This could be explained by an ongoing absence of clear recommendations. As a result, feedback effects are inconclusive: some teams improve their practice, others do not. Although feedback has been conceptualised and studied from different theoretical perspectives, ongoing empirical inconsistencies remain unexplained. The goal of this rapid realist review protocol is to develop a theory that explains how feedback shared with interprofessional health care teams shape nursing performance improvement systems.

Method: This study follows standard guidelines established for realist reviews. Mechanisms at work will be analysed using Actor-Network Theory. All scientific documents are selected from five databases, are published in both English and French between 2010 and 2018, and include empirical research, reviews and grey literature. First, selection of documents will proceed on the basis of titles and abstracts; followed by a second selection by reading the remaining full texts. Inclusion criteria and a data extraction form will be pilot tested with 40 articles prior to completion by two reviewers. Data will be summarised in the form of [context, mechanism, outcome] equations to theorise operational feedback.

Discussion: The innovative combination of Actor-Network Theory with a realist methodology holds promise for the identification of explanatory equations in complex systems and theory development. A rapid realist review is relevant to address an enduring knowledge gap which requires theory development. This preliminary study lays the groundwork for a pioneering theory on feedback in nursing performance improvement systems that will subsequently inform a multiple case study.

Systematic Review Registration: Prospero CRD42018110128.

Citing Articles

The integration of human and non-human actors to advance healthcare delivery: unpacking the role of actor-network theory, a systematic literature review.

Ryan T, Ryan N, Hynes B BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1342.

PMID: 39497065 PMC: 11536900. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11866-4.


"Interprofessional Collaboration" among Pharmacists, Physicians, and Nurses: A Hybrid Concept Analysis.

Kobrai-Abkenar F, Salimi S, Pourghane P Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2024; 29(2):238-244.

PMID: 38721245 PMC: 11075915. DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_336_22.


A Near-Peer Interprofessional Educational Fellowship Program for Training Pre-Clinical Medical Students in the Best Practices of Teaching and Learning.

Wisco J, Moussavi M, White S Med Sci Educ. 2024; 34(1):181-191.

PMID: 38510391 PMC: 10948728. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-023-01936-3.


Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology.

Wilson C, Janes G, Lawton R, Benn J Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(16).

PMID: 37628427 PMC: 10454701. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162229.


How does nursing-sensitive indicator feedback with nursing or interprofessional teams work and shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review.

Rapin J, Pellet J, Mabire C, Gendron S, Dubois C Syst Rev. 2022; 11(1):177.

PMID: 36002846 PMC: 9404638. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02026-y.


References
1.
Bruyneel L, Li B, Ausserhofer D, Lesaffre E, Dumitrescu I, Smith H . Organization of Hospital Nursing, Provision of Nursing Care, and Patient Experiences With Care in Europe. Med Care Res Rev. 2015; 72(6):643-64. PMC: 4631674. DOI: 10.1177/1077558715589188. View

2.
Dubois C, DAmour D, Pomey M, Girard F, Brault I . Conceptualizing performance of nursing care as a prerequisite for better measurement: a systematic and interpretive review. BMC Nurs. 2013; 12:7. PMC: 3600011. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6955-12-7. View

3.
Colquhoun H, Michie S, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Carroll K . Reporting and design elements of audit and feedback interventions: a secondary review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 26(1):54-60. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005004. View

4.
Aiken L, Clarke S, Sloane D, Sochalski J, Silber J . Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA. 2002; 288(16):1987-93. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987. View

5.
Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K . Realist review--a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005; 10 Suppl 1:21-34. DOI: 10.1258/1355819054308530. View