» Articles » PMID: 31330889

Hip and Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Data Analysis for Toddler Activities

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Jul 24
PMID 31330889
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although accelerometry data are widely utilized to estimate physical activity and sedentary behavior among children age 3 years or older, for toddlers age 1 and 2 year(s), accelerometry data recorded during such behaviors have been far less examined. In particular, toddler's unique behaviors, such as riding in a stroller or being carried by an adult, have not yet been examined. The objective of this study was to describe accelerometry signal outputs recorded during participation in nine types of behaviors (i.e., running, walking, climbing up/down, crawling, riding a ride-on toy, standing, sitting, riding in a stroller/wagon, and being carried by an adult) among toddlers. Twenty-four toddlers aged 13 to 35 months (50% girls) performed various prescribed behaviors during free play in a commercial indoor playroom while wearing ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers on a hip and a wrist. Participants' performances were video-recorded. Based on the video data, accelerometer data were annotated with behavior labels to examine accelerometry signal outputs while performing the nine types of behaviors. Accelerometer data collected during 664 behavior assessments from the 21 participants were used for analysis. Hip vertical axis counts for walking were low (median = 49 counts/5 s). They were significantly lower than those recorded while a toddler was "carried" by an adult (median = 144 counts/5 s; < 0.01). While standing, sitting, and riding in a stroller, very low hip vertical axis counts were registered (median ≤ 5 counts/5 s). Although wrist vertical axis and vector magnitude counts for "carried" were not higher than those for walking, they were higher than the cut-points for sedentary behaviors. Using various accelerometry signal features, machine learning techniques showed 89% accuracy to differentiate the "carried" behavior from ambulatory movements such as running, walking, crawling, and climbing. In conclusion, hip vertical axis counts alone may be unable to capture walking as physical activity and "carried" as sedentary behavior among toddlers. Machine learning techniques that utilize additional accelerometry signal features could help to recognize behavior types, especially to differentiate being "carried" from ambulatory movements.

Citing Articles

Physical Activity in Pre-Ambulatory Children with Cerebral Palsy: An Exploratory Validation Study to Distinguish Active vs. Sedentary Time Using Wearable Sensors.

Orlando J, Smith B, Hafer J, Paremski A, Amodeo M, Lobo M Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006490 PMC: 11860784. DOI: 10.3390/s25041261.


Preschoolers' Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity Measured by a Tri-Axial Accelerometer: Compliance with International Guidelines and Different Cut-Points.

Machado-Rodrigues A, da Silva T, Mendes L, Neto A, Nogueira H, Rodrigues D Children (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39594871 PMC: 11593326. DOI: 10.3390/children11111296.


Objective Measurement of Posture and Movement in Young Children Using Wearable Sensors and Customised Mathematical Approaches: A Systematic Review.

Hendry D, Rohl A, Lund Rasmussen C, Zabatiero J, Cliff D, Smith S Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(24).

PMID: 38139507 PMC: 10747033. DOI: 10.3390/s23249661.


Long-form recording of infant body position in the home using wearable inertial sensors.

Franchak J, Tang M, Rousey H, Luo C Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(5):4982-5001.

PMID: 37723373 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02236-9.


Systematic review of accelerometer-based methods for 24-h physical behavior assessment in young children (0-5 years old).

Lettink A, Altenburg T, Arts J, van Hees V, Chinapaw M Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022; 19(1):116.

PMID: 36076221 PMC: 9461103. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-022-01296-y.


References
1.
Kwon S, Janz K, Letuchy E, Burns T, Levy S . Developmental Trajectories of Physical Activity, Sports, and Television Viewing During Childhood to Young Adulthood: Iowa Bone Development Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(7):666-72. PMC: 4596396. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0327. View

2.
Hnatiuk J, Ridgers N, Salmon J, Campbell K, McCallum Z, Hesketh K . Physical activity levels and patterns of 19-month-old children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44(9):1715-20. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825825c4. View

3.
Borkhoff C, Heale L, Anderson L, Tremblay M, Maguire J, Parkin P . Objectively measured physical activity of young Canadian children using accelerometry. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015; 40(12):1302-8. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0164. View

4.
Freedson P, Melanson E, Sirard J . Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30(5):777-81. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021. View

5.
Beets M, Bornstein D, Dowda M, Pate R . Compliance with national guidelines for physical activity in U.S. preschoolers: measurement and interpretation. Pediatrics. 2011; 127(4):658-64. PMC: 3387888. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2021. View