» Articles » PMID: 31328131

Health Information Technology and Accountable Care Organizations: A Systematic Review and Future Directions

Overview
Journal EGEMS (Wash DC)
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2019 Jul 23
PMID 31328131
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Since the inception of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), many have acknowledged the potential synergy between ACOs and health information technology (IT) in meeting quality and cost goals.

Objective: We conducted a systematic review of the literature in order to describe what research has been conducted at the intersection of health IT and ACOs and identify directions for future research.

Methods: We identified empirical studies discussing the use of health IT via PubMed search with subsequent snowball reference review. The type of health IT, how health IT was included in the study, use of theory, population, and findings were extracted from each study.

Results: Our search resulted in 32 studies describing the intersection of health IT and ACOs, mainly in the form of electronic health records and health information exchange. Studies were divided into three streams by purpose; those that considered health IT as a factor for ACO participation, health IT use by current ACOs, and ACO performance as a function of health IT capabilities. Although most studies found a positive association between health IT and ACO participation, studies that address the performance of ACOs in terms of their health IT capabilities show more mixed results.

Conclusions: In order to better understand this emerging relationship between health IT and ACO performance, we propose future research should consider more quasi-experimental studies, the use of theory, and merging health, quality, cost, and health IT use data across ACO member organizations.

Citing Articles

Implementation of a Machine Learning Risk Prediction Model for Postpartum Depression in the Electronic Health Records.

Zhang Y, Joly R, Beecy A, Principe S, Satpathy S, Gore A AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2024; 2024:1057-1066.

PMID: 39444417 PMC: 11497630.


The Impact of Delivery Reform on Health Information Exchange with Behavioral Health Providers: Results from a National Representative Survey of Ambulatory Physicians.

Matthews E Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024; 51(5):818-825.

PMID: 38512556 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01367-1.


Adoption of Electronic Health Record Among Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Frimpong J, Liu X, Liu L, Zhang R J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45238.

PMID: 38096006 PMC: 10755658. DOI: 10.2196/45238.


Introduction of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms Coding Into an Electronic Health Record and Evaluation of its Impact: Qualitative and Quantitative Study.

Pankhurst T, Evison F, Atia J, Gallier S, Coleman J, Ball S JMIR Med Inform. 2021; 9(11):e29532.

PMID: 34817387 PMC: 8663536. DOI: 10.2196/29532.

References
1.
Fisher E, McClellan M, Bertko J, Lieberman S, Lee J, Lewis J . Fostering accountable health care: moving forward in medicare. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28(2):w219-31. PMC: 2656392. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w219. View

2.
Rittenhouse D, Shortell S, Fisher E . Primary care and accountable care--two essential elements of delivery-system reform. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(24):2301-3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0909327. View

3.
Shortell S, Casalino L, Fisher E . How the center for Medicare and Medicaid innovation should test accountable care organizations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(7):1293-8. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0453. View

4.
Fisher E, Shortell S . Accountable care organizations: accountable for what, to whom, and how. JAMA. 2010; 304(15):1715-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1513. View

5.
Berwick D . Launching accountable care organizations--the proposed rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(16):e32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1103602. View