» Articles » PMID: 31323383

Global Prevalence of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 Jul 20
PMID 31323383
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: Most colorectal cancers (CRC) arise from colorectal adenomas, yet there is not enough information on global prevalence to inform health care policy. We examined the prevalence of any type of adenomas, advanced adenomas (AADs), and CRC according to age, sex, ethnicity, geographic regions, and anatomic location (proximal vs distal).

Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched from their inception through May 1, 2018, to identify population-based, observational studies that reported the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia. Studies on participants 15 years or older, with a sample size of 500 persons or more, were included. Metaprop (College Station, TX) was used to model within-study variability by binomial distribution and Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation to stabilize the variances. The prevalence figures were presented by proportions and their 95% CIs using random-effects models.

Results: Our meta-analysis included 70 studies involving 637,414 individuals. The overall prevalence rates of adenoma (23.9%; 95% CI, 22.2%-25.8%), AAD (4.6%; 95% CI, 3.8%-5.5%), and CRC (0.4%, 95% CI, 0.3%-0.5%) were calculated. Subgroup analysis indicated that prevalence values (adenomas, AADs, and CRCs) were higher among men (29.7%, 6.5%, and 0.8%, respectively) than women (19.3%, 3.8% and 0.4%, respectively), among older adults (25.9%, 5.2%, and 0.6%, respectively) than younger adults (14.6%, 1.6%, and 0.1%, respectively), among Caucasians (23.7%, 6.6%, and 0.5%, respectively) than other ethnicities, in European countries (25.9%, 8.4%, and 0.8%, respectively) than other countries, and among patients with proximal (25.9%, 5.3%, and 0.1%, respectively) vs distal neoplasia.

Conclusions: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a high prevalence of colorectal neoplasia among some populations. This indicates a need to expand CRC screening programs for these groups. The pooled prevalence estimates can be used as quality indicators for established CRC screening programs.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the necessity of colonoscopy in patients under 40 with rectal bleeding: insights from a large-scale retrospective analysis.

Obeidat I, Yahia Y, Chandra P, Altaiam A, Mohamed E, Saffo H Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024; 39(1):202.

PMID: 39680187 PMC: 11649774. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04784-8.


Exploring the role of Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal cancer: implications for tumor proliferation and chemoresistance.

Dadgar-Zankbar L, Elahi Z, Shariati A, Khaledi A, Razavi S, Khoshbayan A Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):547.

PMID: 39548531 PMC: 11566256. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01909-y.


Adenoma Detection Rate and Polyp Detection Rate among Gastroenterology Fellows and Consultants in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study.

Macatiag 4th J, Marino B, Pajes A, Yasay E Acta Med Philipp. 2024; 58(16):30-41.

PMID: 39399358 PMC: 11467549. DOI: 10.47895/amp.vi0.8395.


Gastrointestinal manifestations in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS): a systematic review with analysis of individual patient data.

Skat-Rordam P, Kaya Y, Qvist N, Hansen T, Jensen T, Karstensen J Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2024; 22(1):12.

PMID: 39039610 PMC: 11264991. DOI: 10.1186/s13053-024-00284-6.


Demographic and clinical profile of patients undergoing colonoscopy at a tertiary care center in Nepal: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Sharma P, Sapkota P, Gurung R, Silwal P, Yadav B, Gupta N Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(5):2633-2638.

PMID: 38694280 PMC: 11060277. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002003.