» Articles » PMID: 31316904

Evaluation of Mechanical Properties and Cell Viability of Poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate)-Chitosan/AlO Nanocomposite Scaffold for Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Overview
Date 2019 Jul 19
PMID 31316904
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of alumina nanowires as reinforcement phases in polyhydroxybutyrate-chitosan (PHB-CTS) scaffolds to apply in cartilage tissue engineering.

Methods: A certain proportion of polymers and alumina was chosen. After optimization of electrospun parameters, PHB, PHB-CTS, and PHB-CTS/3% AlO nanocomposite scaffolds were randomly electrospun. Scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, water contact angle measurement, tensile strength, and chondrocyte cell culture studies were used to evaluate the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of the scaffolds.

Results: The average fiber diameter of scaffolds was 300-550 nm and the porosity percentages for the first layer of all types of scaffolds were more than 81%. Scaffolds' hydrophilicity was increased by adding alumina and CTS. The tensile strength of scaffolds decreased by adding CTS and increased up to more than 10 folds after adding alumina. Chondrocyte viability and proliferation on scaffolds were better after adding CTS and alumina to PHB.

Conclusion: With regard to the results, electrospun PHB-CTS/3% AlO scaffold has the appropriate potential to apply in cartilage tissue engineering.

Citing Articles

Microbial Polyhydroxyalkanoates Granules: An Approach Targeting Biopolymer for Medical Applications and Developing Bone Scaffolds.

Goswami M, Rekhi P, Debnath M, Ramakrishna S Molecules. 2021; 26(4).

PMID: 33562111 PMC: 7915662. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26040860.


Fabrication of Silk-Hyaluronan Composite as a Potential Scaffold for Tissue Repair.

Yu L, Liu T, Ma Y, Zhang F, Huang Y, Fan Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:578988.

PMID: 33363124 PMC: 7759629. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.578988.


Comprehensive Survey on Nanobiomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.

Kumar P, Saini M, Dehiya B, Sindhu A, Kumar V, Kumar R Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020; 10(10).

PMID: 33066127 PMC: 7601994. DOI: 10.3390/nano10102019.


Electrospun Polymers in Cartilage Engineering-State of Play.

Yilmaz E, Zeugolis D Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:77.

PMID: 32133352 PMC: 7039817. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00077.


Recent Advances in the Use of Polyhydroyalkanoates in Biomedicine.

Rodriguez-Contreras A Bioengineering (Basel). 2019; 6(3).

PMID: 31547270 PMC: 6784168. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering6030082.

References
1.
Thambyah A, Nather A, Goh J . Mechanical properties of articular cartilage covered by the meniscus. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006; 14(6):580-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.01.015. View

2.
Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M, Cavallo C, Desando G, Bartolotti I . Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017; 78:1246-1262. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017. View

3.
Rodriguez-Lorenzo L, Salinas A, Vallet-Regi M, San Roman J . Composite biomaterials based on ceramic polymers. I. Reinforced systems based on Al2O3/PMMA/PLLA. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996; 30(4):515-22. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199604)30:4<515::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-G. View

4.
Song Y, Ju Y, Song G, Morita Y . In vitro proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on nanoporous alumina. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013; 8:2745-56. PMC: 3735283. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S44885. View

5.
Asran A, Razghandi K, Aggarwal N, Michler G, Groth T . Nanofibers from blends of polyvinyl alcohol and polyhydroxy butyrate as potential scaffold material for tissue engineering of skin. Biomacromolecules. 2010; 11(12):3413-21. DOI: 10.1021/bm100912v. View