» Articles » PMID: 31314802

Evaluating Time-reversed Speech and Signal-correlated Noise As Auditory Baselines for Isolating Speech-specific Processing Using FNIRS

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Jul 18
PMID 31314802
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence using well-established imaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrocorticography, suggest that speech-specific cortical responses can be functionally localised by contrasting speech responses with an auditory baseline stimulus, such as time-reversed (TR) speech or signal-correlated noise (SCN). Furthermore, these studies suggest that SCN is a more effective baseline than TR speech. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a relatively novel, optically-based imaging technique with features that make it ideal for investigating speech and language function in paediatric populations. However, it is not known which baseline is best at isolating speech activation when imaging using fNIRS. We presented normal speech, TR speech and SCN in an event-related format to 25 normally-hearing children aged 6-12 years. Brain activity was measured across frontal and temporal brain areas in both cerebral hemispheres whilst children passively listened to the auditory stimuli. In all three conditions, significant activation was observed bilaterally in channels targeting superior temporal regions when stimuli were contrasted against silence. Unlike previous findings in infants, we found no significant activation in the region of interest over superior temporal cortex in school-age children when normal speech was contrasted against either TR speech or SCN. Although no statistically significant lateralisation effects were observed in the region of interest, a left-sided channel targeting posterior temporal regions showed significant activity in response to normal speech only, and was investigated further. Significantly greater activation was observed in this left posterior channel compared to the corresponding channel on the right side under the normal speech vs SCN contrast only. Our findings suggest that neither TR speech nor SCN are suitable auditory baselines for functionally isolating speech-specific processing in an experimental set up involving fNIRS with 6-12 year old children.

Citing Articles

Neuroplasticity of Speech-in-Noise Processing in Older Adults Assessed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Mai G, Jiang Z, Wang X, Tachtsidis I, Howell P Brain Topogr. 2024; 37(6):1139-1157.

PMID: 39042322 PMC: 11408581. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01070-2.


Are acoustics enough? Semantic effects on auditory salience in natural scenes.

Kothinti S, Elhilali M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1276237.

PMID: 38098516 PMC: 10720592. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276237.


Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in pediatric clinical research: Different pathophysiologies and promising clinical applications.

Gallagher A, Wallois F, Obrig H Neurophotonics. 2023; 10(2):023517.

PMID: 36873247 PMC: 9982436. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.10.2.023517.


Investigating Cortical Responses to Noise-Vocoded Speech in Children with Normal Hearing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Mushtaq F, Wiggins I, Kitterick P, Anderson C, Hartley D J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021; 22(6):703-717.

PMID: 34581879 PMC: 8599557. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00817-z.


Analysis methods for measuring passive auditory fNIRS responses generated by a block-design paradigm.

Luke R, Larson E, Shader M, Innes-Brown H, Van Yper L, Lee A Neurophotonics. 2021; 8(2):025008.

PMID: 34036117 PMC: 8140612. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.8.2.025008.


References
1.
Bellani M, Perlini C, Brambilla P . Language disturbances in schizophrenia. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2010; 18(4):314-7. View

2.
Dale A . Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999; 8(2-3):109-14. PMC: 6873302. View

3.
Hoff G, van den Heuvel M, Benders M, Kersbergen K, de Vries L . On development of functional brain connectivity in the young brain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:650. PMC: 3792361. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00650. View

4.
Flowers K, Hudson J . Motor laterality as an indicator of speech laterality. Neuropsychology. 2013; 27(2):256-65. DOI: 10.1037/a0031664. View

5.
Saliba J, Bortfeld H, Levitin D, Oghalai J . Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients. Hear Res. 2016; 338:64-75. PMC: 4967399. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.02.005. View