» Articles » PMID: 31314671

Assessment of the Force-velocity Relationship During Vertical Jumps: Influence of the Starting Position, Analysis Procedures and Number of Loads

Overview
Journal Eur J Sport Sci
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2019 Jul 18
PMID 31314671
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the reliability and magnitude of the force-velocity (F-V) relationship parameters between the squat jumps performed from the 90° (SJ90) and self-preferred knee angle (SJ). A secondary aim was to explore the effect of the analysis procedure (force platform [FP] and Samozino's [SAM] method) and the number of loads tested (three- and two-point methods) on the F-V relationships. Twelve men were tested in two sessions during the SJ90 and SJ. Two identical blocks of jumps were performed in each session against three external loads. The F-V relationship parameters (maximum force, maximum velocity, F-V slope and maximum power) were determined at each block through the FP and SAM procedures using the data collected under three (three-point method) or only the two most distant loads (two-point method). The average coefficient of variation (CV) of the four F-V parameters revealed a higher reliability for the SJ90 compared to the SJ (5.86% 7.55%; CV= 1.29) with more pronounced differences using the FP (CV= 1.43) than the SAM procedure (CV= 1.14), and higher reliability for the SAM compared to the FP (6.14% 7.27%; CV= 1.18). The SJ and SAM procedures provided comparable or higher magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters than the SJ90 and FP, respectively. The three- and two-point methods revealed a comparable reliability and trivial differences in the magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters. The routine testing procedure of the F-V relationship could be simplified using the SJ, the SAM procedure and the two-point method.

Citing Articles

The role of starting knee angle in squat jump force-velocity profiles: interactions with subjects' strength levels and imputed push-off distance.

Qin X, Liu B, Tang R, Liu Y, Garcia-Ramos A Front Physiol. 2025; 16:1551488.

PMID: 40013241 PMC: 11860981. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1551488.


Maturity Offset, Anthropometric Characteristics and Vertical Force-Velocity Profile in Youth Basketball Players.

Jimenez-Daza P, Teba Del Pino L, Calleja-Gonzalez J, de Villarreal E J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023; 8(4).

PMID: 37987496 PMC: 10660756. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk8040160.


Is two-point method a valid and reliable method to predict 1RM? A systematic review.

Chen Z, Gong Z, Pan L, Zhang X PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0294509.

PMID: 37983216 PMC: 10659210. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294509.


The Validity of the 2-Point Method for Assessing the Force-Velocity Relationship of the Knee Flexors and Knee Extensors: The Relevance of Distant Force-Velocity Testing.

Sasek M, Mirkov D, Hadzic V, Sarabon N Front Physiol. 2022; 13:849275.

PMID: 35812338 PMC: 9263277. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.849275.


Effectiveness of individualized training based on force-velocity profiling on physical function in older men.

Lindberg K, Lohne-Seiler H, Fosstveit S, Sibayan E, Fjeller J, Lovold S Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022; 32(6):1013-1025.

PMID: 35305276 PMC: 9313882. DOI: 10.1111/sms.14157.