» Articles » PMID: 31309004

The Prognostic Impact of Age in Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer: a Population-based Study

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2019 Jul 17
PMID 31309004
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of current study was to use competing risk model to calculate the potential differences that age played in the prognosis of different breast cancer subtypes.

Methods: The cohort was selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The cumulative incidences of death (CID) was assessed for breast cancer caused deaths and other causes of mortality. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model and the multivariate subdistribution hazard (SH) model were used to evaluate the prognostic value of age in different breast cancer subtypes.

Results: We involved 33,968 breast cancer patients into our cohort. We found older patients had worse overall survival (OS) than young patients in hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer (HR+/HER2+) (≥40 vs. <40, HR = 2.07, 95% CI [1.28-3.35],  < 0.05). However, when we used competing risk model, we found young age was an independent risk factor only for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (≥40 vs. <40, HR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.56-0.89],  < 0.05). No association was found in other groups.

Conclusion: Our research was currently the largest sample size study and the first competing risk model-based study on the prognostic association between age and different breast cancer subtypes. We found <40 years patients had worse breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) than older patients in the TNBC subtype.

Citing Articles

Cell Populations in Human Breast Cancers are Molecularly and Biologically Distinct with Age.

Parsons A, Colon E, Spasic M, Kurt B, Swarbrick A, Freedman R Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39483921 PMC: 11527348. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5167339/v1.


Advances in 3D Culture Models to Study Exosomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Yousafzai N, El Khalki L, Wang W, Szpendyk J, Sossey-Alaoui K Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38473244 PMC: 10931050. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050883.


A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis for Serum Extracellular Vesicles Reveals APRIL (TNFSF13), CXCL13, and VEGF-A as Prognostic Biomarkers for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Jung H, Kim J, Cho E, Lee J, Kim S, Nam S Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(21).

PMID: 37958571 PMC: 10647725. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115576.


Age has a U-shaped relationship with breast cancer outcomes in women: a cohort study.

Xie Y, Deng Y, Wei S, Huang Z, Li L, Huang K Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1265304.

PMID: 37860197 PMC: 10583555. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265304.


Molecular subtypes as a prognostic breast cancer factor in women users of the São Paulo public health system, Brazil.

Peres S, Arantes P, Fagundes M, AbSaber A, Gimenes D, Curado M Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2023; 26:e230028.

PMID: 37255208 PMC: 10229073. DOI: 10.1590/1980-549720230028.


References
1.
Yasui Y, Potter J . The shape of age-incidence curves of female breast cancer by hormone-receptor status. Cancer Causes Control. 1999; 10(5):431-7. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008970121595. View

2.
Shoker B, Jarvis C, Clarke R, Anderson E, Hewlett J, Davies M . Estrogen receptor-positive proliferating cells in the normal and precancerous breast. Am J Pathol. 1999; 155(6):1811-5. PMC: 1866935. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65498-3. View

3.
Perou C, Sorlie T, Eisen M, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey S, Rees C . Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000; 406(6797):747-52. DOI: 10.1038/35021093. View

4.
Sorlie T, Perou C, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H . Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(19):10869-74. PMC: 58566. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.191367098. View

5.
Tarone R, Chu K . The greater impact of menopause on ER- than ER+ breast cancer incidence: a possible explanation (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2002; 13(1):7-14. DOI: 10.1023/a:1013960609008. View