» Articles » PMID: 31304464

Online Methods for Locating Medical Marijuana Dispensaries: Practical Considerations for Future Research

Overview
Journal Cannabis
Date 2019 Jul 16
PMID 31304464
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knowing the names, locations, and signage of medical marijuana dispensaries is critical for assessing how marijuana availability affects neighborhood quality and marijuana use, yet no detailed methods for locating and coding dispensaries are published. Limitations regarding accuracy of official records, unregulated businesses, and the size of areas where dispensaries are located make it difficult to accurately capture all open dispensaries in any area. In this study, we test a practical and feasible method to collect a point-in-time portrayal of medical marijuana dispensaries in a large urban area lacking an official record of these businesses. Using publicly-available Internet sources alone, we collected the name, address, phone number, signage, and open/closed status of medical marijuana dispensaries in Los Angeles County between October 2016 and February 2017. Data were verified by calling a subset of dispensaries and comparing data against a list of licensed dispensaries. Our methods yielded 872 unique dispensaries in Los Angeles County, of which 470 were open. Most open stores were discernable by a green cross sign; however, few had names that clearly indicated the store sold marijuana. Data verification procedures showed that Internet sources were able to locate nearly all dispensaries in the county that were then verified with non-Internet methods, such as calling the businesses to confirm information. This study is significant as it provides methodology that can be replicated in other metropolitan areas, facilitating comparisons across databases in different locations and regulatory environments. However, caution should be taken when solely using Internet sources. Accurate information on dispensary names, locations, and signage can advance research and provide important information for policy decisions. Methods for enhancing the online methods described in this study are discussed.

Citing Articles

Accuracy Differences in Cannabis Retailer Information Ascertained from Webservices and Government-Maintained State Registries Across US States Legalizing the Sale of Cannabis in 2019.

Williams M, Mahlan M, Holmes C, Pankowska M, Kaur M, Ilegbusi A Cannabis. 2023; 6(2):133-148.

PMID: 37484053 PMC: 10361797. DOI: 10.26828/cannabis/2023/000148.


Using Online Crowdsourced Data to Measure the Availability of Cannabis Home Delivery: A Pilot Study.

Matthay E, Gupta A, Mousli L, Schmidt L J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023; 84(2):330-334.

PMID: 36971754 PMC: 10171251. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.22-00171.


Concentration of Cannabis and Tobacco Retailers in Los Angeles County, California: A Spatial Analysis of Potential Effects on Youth and Ethnic Minorities.

Rhee J, Vieira V, Firth C, Pedersen E, Dunbar M, Timberlake D J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022; 83(4):502-511.

PMID: 35838427 PMC: 9318698.


Association of Tetrahydrocannabinol Content and Price in Herbal Cannabis Products Offered by Dispensaries in California: A Purview of Consumers/Patients.

Dobbins M, Rakkar M, Cunnane K, Pennypacker S, Wagoner K, Reboussin B Front Public Health. 2022; 10:893009.

PMID: 35784239 PMC: 9247604. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.893009.


Associations of cannabis product source and subsequent cannabis use among adolescents.

Kelleghan A, Sofis M, Budney A, Ceasar R, Leventhal A Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022; 233:109374.

PMID: 35272186 PMC: 8999876. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109374.


References
1.
Celebucki C, Diskin K . A longitudinal study of externally visible cigarette advertising on retail storefronts in Massachusetts before and after the Master Settlement Agreement. Tob Control. 2002; 11 Suppl 2:ii47-53. PMC: 1766083. DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii47. View

2.
Pacula R, Chriqui J, Reichmann D, Terry-McElrath Y . State medical marijuana laws: understanding the laws and their limitations. J Public Health Policy. 2003; 23(4):413-39. View

3.
Hillier A, Cole B, Smith T, Yancey A, Williams J, Grier S . Clustering of unhealthy outdoor advertisements around child-serving institutions: a comparison of three cities. Health Place. 2009; 15(4):935-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.02.014. View

4.
Kepple N, Freisthler B . Exploring the ecological association between crime and medical marijuana dispensaries. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012; 73(4):523-30. PMC: 3364319. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.523. View

5.
Freisthler B, Kepple N, Sims R, Martin S . Evaluating medical marijuana dispensary policies: spatial methods for the study of environmentally-based interventions. Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 51(1-2):278-88. PMC: 3683594. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-012-9542-6. View