» Articles » PMID: 31303892

Powering Sustainable Development Within Planetary Boundaries

Overview
Date 2019 Jul 16
PMID 31303892
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The concept of planetary boundaries identifies a safe space for humanity. Current energy systems are primarily designed with a focus on total cost minimization and bounds on greenhouse gas emissions. Omitting planetary boundaries in energy systems design can lead to energy mixes unable to power our sustainable development. To overcome this conceptual limitation, we here incorporate planetary boundaries into energy systems models, explicitly linking energy generation with the Earth's ecological limits. Taking the United States as a testbed, we found that the least cost energy mix that would meet the Paris Agreement 2 degrees Celsius target still transgresses five out of eight planetary boundaries. It is possible to meet seven out of eight planetary boundaries concurrently by incurring a doubling of the cost compared to the least cost energy mix solution (1.3% of the United States gross domestic product in 2017). Due to the stringent downscaled planetary boundary on biogeochemical nitrogen flow, there is no energy mix in the United States capable of satisfying all planetary boundaries concurrently. Our work highlights the importance of considering planetary boundaries in energy systems design and paves the way for further research on how to effectively accomplish such integration in energy related studies.

Citing Articles

Sustainable Development Goals-Based Prospective Process Design Using Hybrid Modeling.

Jog S, Vazquez D, Santos L, Medrano-Garcia J, Guillen-Gosalbez G Ind Eng Chem Res. 2025; 64(5):2816-2830.

PMID: 39926436 PMC: 11803627. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03563.


Towards planetary boundary sustainability of food processing wastewater, by resource recovery & emission reduction: A process system engineering perspective.

Durkin A, Vinestock T, Guo M Unknown. 2025; 13:None.

PMID: 39759871 PMC: 11698304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100319.


Nexus among the perceived infrastructural, social, economic, and environmental impact of CPEC: A case of Pakistan.

Anwar S, Yuan P, Wuyi Z, Amir S, Ur Rehman S, Yang L Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33355.

PMID: 39035540 PMC: 11259830. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33355.


Global food trade alleviates transgressions of planetary boundaries at the national scale.

Liao X, Liu A, Chai L iScience. 2023; 26(10):107794.

PMID: 37720085 PMC: 10504541. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107794.


Food production in China requires intensified measures to be consistent with national and provincial environmental boundaries.

Hu Y, Su M, Wang Y, Cui S, Meng F, Yue W Nat Food. 2023; 1(9):572-582.

PMID: 37128013 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-020-00143-2.


References
1.
Gruber N, Galloway J . An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature. 2008; 451(7176):293-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature06592. View

2.
Rockstrom J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Stuart Chapin 3rd F, Lambin E . A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 2009; 461(7263):472-5. DOI: 10.1038/461472a. View

3.
Fripp M . Switch: a planning tool for power systems with large shares of intermittent renewable energy. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(11):6371-8. DOI: 10.1021/es204645c. View

4.
Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockstrom J, Ohman M, Shyamsundar P . Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature. 2013; 495(7441):305-7. DOI: 10.1038/495305a. View

5.
Cole M, Bailey R, New M . Tracking sustainable development with a national barometer for South Africa using a downscaled "safe and just space" framework. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(42):E4399-408. PMC: 4210279. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1400985111. View